The Balkans: A History of Bulgaria—Serbia—Greece—Rumania—TurkeyHogarth, D. G. (David George)
History
The Balkans: A History of Bulgaria—Serbia—Greece—Rumania—Turkey
Hogarth, D. G. (David George)
Balkan Peninsula -- History; Eastern question (Balkan)
The tragic development of the crisis in the summer of 1914 threw
Rumania into a vortex of unexpected hopes and fears. Aspirations till
then considered little else than Utopian became tangible possibilities,
while, as suddenly, dangers deemed far off loomed large and near. Not
only was such a situation quite unforeseen, nor had any plan of action
been preconceived to meet it, but it was in Rumania’s case a situation
unique from the number of conflicting considerations and influences at
work within it. Still under the waning influence of the thirty years
quasi-alliance with Austria, Rumania was not yet acclimatized to her
new relations with Russia. Notwithstanding the inborn sympathy with and
admiration for France, the Rumanians could not be blind to Germany’s
military power. The enthusiasm that would have sided with France for
France’s sake was faced by the influence of German finance. Sympathy
with Serbia existed side by side with suspicion of Bulgaria. Popular
sentiment clashed with the views of the king; and the bright vision of
the ‘principle of nationality’ was darkened by the shadow of Russia as
despot of the Near East.
One fact in the situation stood out from the rest, namely, the
unexpected opportunity of redeeming that half of the Rumanian nation
which was still under foreign rule; the more so as one of the parties
in the conflict had given the ‘principle of nationality’ a prominent
place in its programme. But the fact that both Austria-Hungary and
Russia had a large Rumanian population among their subjects rendered a
purely national policy impossible, and Rumania could do nothing but
weigh which issue offered her the greater advantage.
Three ways lay open: complete neutrality, active participation on the
side of the Central Powers, or common cause with the Triple Entente.
Complete neutrality was advocated by a few who had the country’s
material security most at heart, and also, as a _pis aller_, by those
who realized that their opinion that Rumania should make common cause
with the Central Powers had no prospect of being acted upon.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account