The Balkans: A History of Bulgaria—Serbia—Greece—Rumania—TurkeyHogarth, D. G. (David George)
History
The Balkans: A History of Bulgaria—Serbia—Greece—Rumania—Turkey
Hogarth, D. G. (David George)
Balkan Peninsula -- History; Eastern question (Balkan)
However suspicious Rumania may be of Russia, however bitter the
quarrels between Bulgars, Greeks, and Serbs, it is not, nor can it ever
be natural, that peoples who have groaned under Turkish despotism for
centuries should, after only one year of complete liberation, join
hands with an old and dreaded enemy not only against their fellow
sufferers, but even against those who came ‘to die that they may live’.
These are the Dead Sea fruits of dynastic policy. Called to the thrones
of the small states of the Near East for the purpose of creating order
and peace, the German dynasties have overstepped their function and
abused the power entrusted to them. As long as, in normal times,
political activities were confined to the diplomatic arena there was no
peril of rousing the masses out of their ignorant indolence; but, when
times are abnormal, it is a different and a dangerous thing to march
these peoples against their most intimate feelings. When, as the
outcome of the present false situation, sooner or later the dynastic
power breaks, it will then be for the powers who are now fighting for
better principles not to impose their own views upon the peoples, or to
place their own princes upon the vacant thrones. Rather must they see
that the small nations of the Near East are given a chance to develop
in peace and according to their proper ideals; that they be not again
subjected to the disintegrating influence of European diplomacy; and
that, above all, to the nations in common, irrespective of their
present attitude, there should be a just application of the ‘principle
of nationality’.
TURKEY
Turkey is no better name for the Osmanli dominion or any part of it
than Normandy would be for Great Britain. It is a mediaeval error of
nomenclature sanctioned by long usage in foreign mouths, but without
any equivalent in the vernacular of the Osmanlis themselves. The real
‘Turkey’ is Turkestan, and the real Turks are the Turcomans. The
Osmanlis are the least typical Turks surviving. Only a very small
proportion of them have any strain of Turkish blood, and this is
diluted till it is rarely perceptible in their physiognomy: and if
environment rather than blood is to be held responsible for racial
features, it can only be said that the territory occupied by the
Osmanlis is as unlike the homeland of the true Turks as it can well be,
and is quite unsuited to typically Turkish life and manners.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account