The Balkans: A History of Bulgaria—Serbia—Greece—Rumania—TurkeyHogarth, D. G. (David George)
History
The Balkans: A History of Bulgaria—Serbia—Greece—Rumania—Turkey
Hogarth, D. G. (David George)
Balkan Peninsula -- History; Eastern question (Balkan)
A considerable body of Christian Serbs had stood up in Murad’s line at
the battle of Konia in 1381, before the treachery of another body of
the same race gave him the victory eight years later at Kosovo. So
little did the Osmanli state model itself on the earlier caliphial
empires and so naturally did it lean towards the Roman or Byzantine
imperial type.
And just because it had come to be in Europe and of Europe, it was able
to survive the terrible disaster of Angora in 1402. Though the Osmanli
army was annihilated by Timur, and an Osmanli sultan, for the first and
last time in history, remained in the hands of the foe, the
administrative machinery of the Osmanli state was not paralysed. A new
ruler was proclaimed at Adrianople, and the European part of the realm
held firm. The moment that the Tartars began to give ground, the
Osmanlis began to recover it. In less than twenty years they stood
again in Asia as they were before Timur’s attack, and secure for the
time on the east, could return to restore their prestige in the west,
where the Tartar victory had bred unrest and brought both the
Hungarians and the Venetians on the Balkan scene. Their success was
once more rapid and astonishing: Salonika passed once and for all into
Ottoman hands: the Frank seigneurs and the despots of Greece were alike
humbled; and although Murad II failed to crush the Albanian,
Skanderbey, he worsted his most dangerous foe, John Hunyadi, with the
help of Wallach treachery at the second battle of Kosovo. At his death,
three years later, he left the Balkans quiet and the field clear for
his successor to proceed with the long deferred but inevitable
enterprise of attacking all that was left of Greek empire, the district
and city of Constantinople.
The doom of New Rome was fulfilled within two years. In the end it
passed easily enough into the hands of those who already had been in
possession of its proper empire for a century or more. Historians have
made more of this fall of Constantinople in 1453 than contemporary
opinion seems to have made of it. No prince in Europe was moved to any
action by its peril, except, very half-heartedly, the Doge. Venice
could not feel quite indifferent to the prospect of the main part of
that empire, which, while in Greek hands, had been her most serious
commercial competitor, passing into the stronger hands of the Osmanlis.
Once in Constantinople, the latter, long a land power only, would be
bound to concern themselves with the sea also. The Venetians made no
effort worthy of their apprehensions, though these were indeed
exceedingly well founded; for, as all the world knows, to the sea the
Osmanlis did at once betake themselves. In less than thirty years they
were ranging all the eastern Mediterranean and laying siege to Rhodes,
the stronghold of one of their most dangerous competitors, the Knights
Hospitallers.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account