The Balkans: A History of Bulgaria—Serbia—Greece—Rumania—TurkeyHogarth, D. G. (David George)
History
The Balkans: A History of Bulgaria—Serbia—Greece—Rumania—Turkey
Hogarth, D. G. (David George)
Balkan Peninsula -- History; Eastern question (Balkan)
Before Mohammed died in 1481 the Osmanli Turco-Grecian nation may be
said to have come into its own. It was lord _de facto et de jure belli_
of the eastern or Greek Empire, that is of all territories and seas
grouped geographically round Constantinople as a centre, with only a
few exceptions unredeemed, of which the most notable were the islands
of Cyprus, Rhodes, and Krete, still in Latin hands. Needless to say,
the Osmanlis themselves differed greatly from their imperial
predecessors. Their official speech, their official creed, their family
system were all foreign to Europe, and many of their ideas of
government had been learned in the past from Persia and China, or were
derived from the original tribal organization of the true Turks. But if
they were neither more nor less Asiatics than the contemporary
Russians, they were quite as much Europeans as many of the Greek
emperors had been—those of the Isaurian dynasty, for instance. They had
given no evidence as yet of a fanatical Moslem spirit—this was to be
bred in them by subsequent experiences—and their official creed had
governed their policy hardly more than does ours in India or Egypt.
Mohammed the Conqueror had not only shown marked favour to Christians,
whether his _rayas_ or not, but encouraged letters and the arts in a
very un-Arabian spirit. Did he not have himself portrayed by Gentile
Bellini? The higher offices of state, both civil and military, were
confided (and would continue so to be for a century to come) almost
exclusively to men of Christian origin. Commerce was encouraged, and
western traders recognized that their facilities were greater now than
they had been under Greek rule. The Venetians, for example, enjoyed in
perfect liberty a virtual monopoly of the Aegean and Euxine trade. The
social condition of the peasantry seems to have been better than it had
been under Greek seigneurs, whether in Europe or in Asia, and better
than it was at the moment in feudal Christendom. The Osmanli military
organization was reputed the best in the world, and its fame attracted
adventurous spirits from all over Europe to learn war in the first
school of the age. Ottoman armies, it is worth while to remember, were
the only ones then attended by efficient medical and commissariat
services, and may be said to have introduced to Europe these
alleviations of the horrors of war.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account