The Balkans: A History of Bulgaria—Serbia—Greece—Rumania—TurkeyHogarth, D. G. (David George)
History
The Balkans: A History of Bulgaria—Serbia—Greece—Rumania—Turkey
Hogarth, D. G. (David George)
Balkan Peninsula -- History; Eastern question (Balkan)
At the same time Fate, rather than any sultan, must be blamed. It was
impossible to forgo some further extension of the empire, and very
difficult to arrest extension at any satisfactory static point. For one
thing, as has been pointed out already, there were important
territories in the proper Byzantine sphere still unredeemed at the
death of Mohammed. Rhodes, Krete, and Cyprus, whose possession carried
with it something like superior control of the Levantine trade, were in
Latin hands. Austrian as well as Venetian occupation of the best
harbours was virtually closing the Adriatic to the masters of the
Balkans. Nor could the inner lands of the Peninsula be quite securely
held while the great fortress of Belgrade, with the passage of the
Danube, remained in Hungarian keeping, Furthermore, the Black Sea,
which all masters of the Bosphorus have desired to make a Byzantine
lake, was in dispute with the Wallachs and the Poles; and, in the reign
of Mohammed’s successor, a cloud no bigger than a man’s hand came up
above its northern horizon—the harbinger of the Muscovite.
As for the Asiatic part of the Byzantine sphere, there was only one
little corner in the south-east to be rounded off to bring all the
Anatolian peninsula under the Osmanli. But that corner, the Cilician
plain, promised trouble, since it was held by another Islamic power,
that of the Egyptian Mamelukes, which, claiming to be at least equal to
the Osmanli, possessed vitality much below its pretensions. The
temptation to poach on it was strong, and any lord of Constantinople
who once gave way to this, would find himself led on to assume control
of all coasts of the easternmost Levant, and then to push into inland
Asia in quest of a scientific frontier at their back—perilous and
costly enterprise which Rome had essayed again and again and had to
renounce in the end. Bayezid II took the first step by summoning the
Mameluke to evacuate certain forts near Tarsus, and expelling his
garrisons _vi et armis_. Cilicia passed to the Osmanli; but for the
moment he pushed no farther. Bayezid, who was under the obligation
always to lead his army in person, could make but one campaign at a
time; and a need in Europe was the more pressing. In quitting Cilicia,
however, he left open a new question in Ottoman politics—the Asiatic
continental question—and indicated to his successor a line of least
resistance on which to advance. Nor would this be his only dangerous
legacy. The prolonged and repeated raids into Adriatic lands, as far
north as Carniola and Carinthia, with which the rest of Bayezid’s reign
was occupied, brought Ottoman militarism at last to a point, whose
eventual attainment might have been foreseen any time in the past
century— the point at which, strong in the possession of a new arm,
artillery, it would assume control of the state.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account