The Balkans: A History of Bulgaria—Serbia—Greece—Rumania—TurkeyHogarth, D. G. (David George)
History
The Balkans: A History of Bulgaria—Serbia—Greece—Rumania—Turkey
Hogarth, D. G. (David George)
Balkan Peninsula -- History; Eastern question (Balkan)
If Constantinople should be lost, the Arab-speaking parts of the empire
would in all likelihood break away, carrying the Holy Cities with them.
When the constant risk of this consummation, with the cataclysmic
nature of its consequences is considered, one marvels why the
Committee, which has shown no mean understanding of some conditions
essential to Osmanli empire, should have done so little hitherto to
conciliate Arab susceptibilities. Neither in the constitution of the
parliament nor in the higher commands of the army have the
Arab-speaking peoples been given anything like their fair share; and
loudly and insistently have they protested. Perhaps the Committee,
whose leading members are of a markedly Europeanized type, understands
Asia less well than Europe. Certainly its programme of Ottomanization,
elaborated by military ex-attachés, by Jew bankers and officials from
Salonika, and by doctors, lawyers, and other _intellectuels_ fresh from
Paris, was conceived on lines which offered the pure Asiatic very
little scope. The free and equal Osmanlis were all to take their cue
from men of the Byzantine sort which the European provinces, and
especially the city of Constantinople, breed. After the revolution,
nothing in Turkey struck one so much as the apparition on the top of
things everywhere of a type of Osmanli who has the characteristic
qualities of the Levantine Greek. Young officers, controlling their
elders, only needed a change of uniform to pass in an Athenian crowd.
Spare and dapper officials, presiding in seats of authority over Kurds
and Arabs, reminded one of Greek journalists. Osmanli journalists
themselves treated one to rhodomontades punctuated with restless
gesticulation, which revived memories of Athenian cafés in war-time. It
was the Byzantine triumphing over the Asiatic; and the most Asiatic
elements in the empire were the least likely to meet with the
appreciation or sympathy of the Byzantines.
Are the Arab-speaking peoples, therefore, likely to revolt, or be
successful in splitting the Ottoman Empire, if they do? The present
writer would like to say, in parenthesis, that, in his opinion, this
consummation of the empire is not devoutly to be wished. The
substitution of Arab administration for Osmanli would necessarily
entail European tutelage of the parts of the Arab-speaking area in
which powers, like ourselves, have vital interests—Syria, for example,
southern Mesopotamia, and, probably, Hejaz. The last named, in
particular, would involve us in so ticklish and thankless a task, that
one can only be thankful for the Turkish caretaker there to-day, and
loth to see him dismissed.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account