The Balkans: A History of Bulgaria—Serbia—Greece—Rumania—TurkeyHogarth, D. G. (David George)
History
The Balkans: A History of Bulgaria—Serbia—Greece—Rumania—Turkey
Hogarth, D. G. (David George)
Balkan Peninsula -- History; Eastern question (Balkan)
There were several external factors which at this time favoured the
rise of the Serbian state. Byzantium and the Greek Empire, to which the
Emperor Manuel Comnenus had by 1168 restored some measure of its former
greatness and splendour, regaining temporary control, after a long war
with Hungary, even over Dalmatia, Croatia, and Bosnia, after this date
began definitively to decline, and after the troublous times of the
fourth crusade (1204), when for sixty years a Latin empire was
established on the Bosphorus, never again recovered as a Christian
state the position in the Balkan peninsula which it had so long
enjoyed. Bulgaria, too, after the meteoric glory of its second empire
under the Asen dynasty (1186-1258), quite went to pieces, the eastern
and northern parts falling under Tartar, the southern under Greek
influence, while the western districts fell to Serbia. In the north, on
the other hand, Hungary was becoming a dangerous and ambitious
neighbour. During the thirteenth century, it is true, the attention of
the Magyars was diverted by the irruption into and devastation of their
country by their unwelcome kinsmen from Asia, the Tartars, who wrought
great havoc and even penetrated as far as the Adriatic coast.
Nevertheless Hungary was always a menace to Serbia; Croatia, Slavonia,
and the interior of Dalmatia, all purely Serb territories, belonged to
the Hungarian crown, and Bosnia was under the supremacy of the Magyars,
though nominally independent.
The objects of the Magyars were twofold—to attain the hegemony of the
Balkan peninsula by conquering all the still independent Serb
territories, and to bring the peninsula within the pale of Rome. They
were not successful in either of these objects, partly because their
wars with the Serbian rulers always failed to reach a decision, partly
because their plans conflicted with those of the powerful Venetian
republic. The relations between Venice and Serbia were always most
cordial, as their ambitions did not clash; those of Venice were not
continental, while those of Serbia were never maritime. The
semi-independent Slavonic city-republic of Ragusa (called Dubrovnik in
Serbian) played a very important part throughout this period. It was
under Venetian supremacy, but was self-governing and had a large fleet
of its own. It was the great place of exchange between Serbia and
western Europe, and was really the meeting-place of East and West. Its
relations with Serbia were by no means always peaceful; it was a
Naboth’s vineyard for the rulers and people of the inland kingdom, and
it was never incorporated within their dominions. Ragusa and the other
cities of the Dalmatian coast were the home during the Middle Ages of a
flourishing school of Serbian literature, which was inspired by that of
Italy. The influence of Italian civilization and of the Italian Church
was naturally strong in the Serb province, much of which was under
Venetian rule; the reason for this was that communication by sea with
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account