The Balkans: A History of Bulgaria—Serbia—Greece—Rumania—TurkeyHogarth, D. G. (David George)
History
The Balkans: A History of Bulgaria—Serbia—Greece—Rumania—Turkey
Hogarth, D. G. (David George)
Balkan Peninsula -- History; Eastern question (Balkan)
During the reigns of Joseph II (1780-90) and Leopold II (1790-2) their
treatment at the hands of the Magyars somewhat improved. From the
beginning of the eighteenth century Montenegro began to assume greater
importance in the extremely gradual revival of the national spirit of
the Serbs. During the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries it had formed
part of the Turkish dominions, though, thanks to the inaccessible
nature of its mountain fastnesses, Turkish authority was never very
forcibly asserted. It was ruled by a prince-bishop, and its religious
independence thus connoted a certain secular freedom of thought if not
of action. In the seventeenth century warlike encounters between the
Turks and the Montenegrins increased in frequency, and the latter tried
to enlist the help of Venice on their side but with indifferent
success. The fighting in Montenegro was often rather civil in
character, being caused by the ill-feeling which existed between the
numerous Montenegrins who had become Mohammedans and those who remained
faithful to their national Church. In the course of the eighteenth
century the rôle which fell to Montenegro became more important. In all
the other Serb countries the families which naturally took a leading
part in affairs were either extinct or in exile, as in Serbia, or had
become Mohammedan, and therefore to all intents and purposes Turkish,
as in Bosnia and Hercegovina. Ragusa, since the great earthquake in
1667, had greatly declined in power and was no longer of international
importance. In Montenegro, on the other hand, there had survived both a
greater independence of spirit (Montenegro was, after all, the ancient
Zeta, and had always been a centre of national life) and a number of at
any rate eugenic if not exactly aristocratic Serb families; these
families naturally looked on themselves and on their bishop as destined
to play an important part in the resistance to and the eventual
overthrow of the Turkish dominion. The prince-bishop had to be
consecrated by the Patriarch of Peć, and in 1700 Patriarch Arsen III
consecrated one Daniel, of the house (which has been ever since then
and is now still the reigning dynasty of Montenegro) of
Petrović-Njegoš, to this office, after he had been elected to it by the
council of notables at Cetinje. Montenegro, isolated from the Serbs in
the north, and precluded from participating with them in the wars
between Austria and Turkey by the intervening block of Bosnia, which
though Serb by nationality was solidly Mohammedan and therefore
pro-Turkish, carried on its feuds with the Turks independently of the
other Serbs. But when Peter the Great initiated his anti-Turkish
policy, and, in combination with the expansion of Russia to the south
and west, began to champion the cause of the Balkan Christians, he
developed intercourse with Montenegro and laid the foundation of that
friendship between the vast Russian Empire and the tiny Serb
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account