The Balkans: A History of Bulgaria—Serbia—Greece—Rumania—TurkeyHogarth, D. G. (David George)
History
The Balkans: A History of Bulgaria—Serbia—Greece—Rumania—Turkey
Hogarth, D. G. (David George)
Balkan Peninsula -- History; Eastern question (Balkan)
The liberation of Serbia from the Turkish dominion and its
establishment as an independent state were matters of much slower and
more arduous accomplishment than were the same processes in the other
Balkan countries. One reason for this was that Serbia by its peculiar
geographical position was cut off from outside help. It was easy for
the western powers to help Greece with their fleets, and for Russia to
help Rumania and, later, Bulgaria directly with its army, because
communication between them was easy. But Serbia on the one hand was
separated from the sea, first by Dalmatia, which was always in foreign
possession, and then by Bosnia, Hercegovina, and the _sandjak_ (or
province) of Novi-Pazar, all of which territories, though ethnically
Serb, were strongholds of Turkish influence owing to their large
Mohammedan population. The energies of Montenegro, also cut off from
the sea by Dalmatia and Turkey, were absorbed in self-defence, though
it gave Serbia all the support which its size permitted. Communication,
on the other hand, between Russia and Serbia was too difficult to
permit of military help being rapidly and effectively brought to bear
upon the Turks from that quarter. Bessarabia, Wallachia, and Moldavia
were then still under Turkish control, and either they had to be
traversed or the Danube had to be navigated from its mouth upwards
through Turkish territory. The only country which could have helped
Serbia was Austria, but as it was against their best interests to do
so, the Austrians naturally did all they could not to advance, but to
retard the Serbian cause. As a result of all this Serbia, in her long
struggle against the Turks, had to rely principally on its own
resources, though Russian diplomacy several times saved the renascent
country from disaster.
Another reason for the slowness of the emancipation and development of
modern Serbia has been the proneness of its people to internal
dissension. There was no national dynasty on whom the leadership of the
country would naturally devolve after the first successful revolution
against Turkish rule, there was not even any aristocracy left, and no
foreign ruler was ever asked for by the Serbs or was ever imposed on
them by the other nations as in the case of Greece, Rumania, and
Bulgaria. On the other hand the rising against Turkey was a rising of
the whole people, and it was almost inevitable that as soon as some
measure of independence was gained the unity the Serbs had shown when
fighting against their oppressors should dissolve and be replaced by
bitter rivalries and disputes amongst the various local leaders who had
become prominent during the rebellion.
These rivalries early in the nineteenth century resolved themselves
into a blood-feud between two families, the Karagjorgjević and the
Obrenović, a quarrel that filled Serbian history and militated against
the progress of the Serb people throughout the nineteenth century.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account