The Balkans: A History of Bulgaria—Serbia—Greece—Rumania—TurkeyHogarth, D. G. (David George)
History
The Balkans: A History of Bulgaria—Serbia—Greece—Rumania—Turkey
Hogarth, D. G. (David George)
Balkan Peninsula -- History; Eastern question (Balkan)
During his rule of Serbia, which lasted virtually from 1817 till 1839,
Prince Miloš did a very great deal for the welfare of his country. He
emancipated the Serbian Church from the trammels of the Greek
Patriarchate of Constantinople in 1831, from which date onwards it was
ruled by a Metropolitan of Serb nationality, resident at Belgrade. He
encouraged the trade of the country, a great deal of which he held in
his own hands; he was in fact a sort of prototype of those modern
Balkan business-kings of whom King George of Greece and King Carol of
Rumania were the most notable examples. He raised an army and put it on
a permanent footing, and organized the construction of roads, schools,
and churches. He was, however, an autocratic ruler of the old school,
and he had no inclination to share the power for the attainment of
which he had laboured so many years and gone through so much. From his
definite installation as hereditary prince discontent at his arbitrary
methods of government amongst his ex-equals increased, and after
several revolts he was forced eventually to grant a constitution in
1835. This, however, remained a dead letter, and things went on as
before. Later in the same year he paid a prolonged visit to his
suzerain at Constantinople, and while he was there the situation in
Serbia became still more serious. After his return he was, after
several years of delay and of growing unpopularity, compelled to agree
to another constitution which was forced on him, paradoxically enough,
by the joint efforts of the Tsar and of the Sultan, who seemed to take
an unnatural pleasure in supporting the democratic Serbians against
their successful colleague in autocracy, who had done so much for his
turbulent subjects. Serbia even in those days was essentially and
uncompromisingly democratic, but even so Miloš obstinately refused to
carry out the provisions of the constitution or in any way to submit to
a curtailment of his power, and in 1839 he left his ungrateful
principality and took refuge in Rumania, where he possessed an estate,
abdicating in favour of his elder son Milan. This Prince Milan, known
as Obrenović II, was seriously ill at the time of his accession, and
died within a month of it. He was succeeded by his younger brother
Michael, known as Obrenović III, who was then only sixteen years of
age. This prince, though young, had a good head on his shoulders, and
eventually proved the most gifted ruler modern Serbia has ever had. His
first reign (1840-2), however, did not open well. He inaugurated it by
paying a state visit to Constantinople, but the Sultan only recognized
him as elective prince and insisted on his having two advisers approved
and appointed by the Porte. Michael on his return showed his
determination to have nothing to do with them, but this led to a
rebellion headed by one of them, Vučić, and, though Michael’s rule was
not as arbitrary as his father’s, he had to bow to the popular will
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account