The Balkans: A History of Bulgaria—Serbia—Greece—Rumania—TurkeyHogarth, D. G. (David George)
History
The Balkans: A History of Bulgaria—Serbia—Greece—Rumania—Turkey
Hogarth, D. G. (David George)
Balkan Peninsula -- History; Eastern question (Balkan)
It was inevitable that, after the sensation which such an event could
not fail to cause in twentieth-century Europe, it should take the
country where it occurred some time to live down the results. Other
powers, especially those of western Europe, looked coldly on Serbia and
were in no hurry to resume diplomatic intercourse, still less to offer
diplomatic support. The question of the punishment and exile of the
conspirators was almost impossible of solution, and only time was able
to obliterate the resentment caused by the whole affair. In Serbia
itself a great change took place. The new sovereign, though he laboured
under the greatest possible disadvantages, by his irreproachable
behaviour, modesty, tact, and strictly constitutional rule, was able to
withdraw the court of Belgrade from the trying limelight to which it
had become used. The public finances began to be reorganized, commerce
began to improve in spite of endless tariff wars with Austria-Hungary,
and attention was again diverted from home to foreign politics. With
the gradual spread of education and increase of communication, and the
growth of national self-consciousness amongst the Serbs and Croats of
Austria-Hungary and the two independent Serb states, a new movement for
the closer intercourse amongst the various branches of the Serb race
for south Slav unity, as it was called, gradually began to take shape.
At the same time a more definitely political agitation started in
Serbia, largely inspired by the humiliating position of economic
bondage in which the country was held by Austria-Hungary, and was
roughly justified by the indisputable argument: ‘Serbia must expand or
die.’ Expansion at the cost of Turkey seemed hopeless, because even the
acquisition of Macedonia would give Serbia a large alien population and
no maritime outlet. It was towards the Adriatic that the gaze of the
Serbs was directed, to the coast which was ethnically Serbian and could
legitimately be considered a heritage of the Serb race.
Macedonia was also taken into account, schools and armed bands began
their educative activity amongst those inhabitants of the unhappy
province who were Serb, or who lived in places where Serbs had lived,
or who with sufficient persuasion could be induced to call themselves
Serb; but the principal stream of propaganda was directed westwards
into Bosnia and Hercegovina. The antagonism between Christian and
Mohammedan, Serb and Turk, was never so bitter as between Christian and
Christian, Serb and German or Magyar, and the Serbs were clever enough
to see that Bosnia and Hercegovina, from every point of view, was to
them worth ten Macedonias, though it would he ten times more difficult
to obtain. Bosnia and Hercegovina, though containing three confessions,
were ethnically homogeneous, and it was realised that these two
provinces were as important to Serbia and Montenegro as the rest of
Italy had been to Piedmont.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account