The Balkans: A History of Bulgaria—Serbia—Greece—Rumania—TurkeyHogarth, D. G. (David George)
History
The Balkans: A History of Bulgaria—Serbia—Greece—Rumania—Turkey
Hogarth, D. G. (David George)
Balkan Peninsula -- History; Eastern question (Balkan)
The Serbs in Serbia were the only ones who could claim to
be free, but even this was a freedom entirely dependent on the economic
malevolence of Austria-Hungary and Turkey. Cut up in this way by the
hand of fate into such a number of helpless fragments, it was
inevitable that the Serb race, if it possessed any vitality, should
attempt, at any cost, to piece some if not all of them together and
form an ethnical whole which, economically and politically, should be
master of its own destinies. It was equally inevitable that the policy
of Austria-Hungary should be to anticipate or definitively render any
such attempt impossible, because obviously the formation of a large
south Slav state, by cutting off Austria from the Adriatic and
eliminating from the dual monarchy all the valuable territory between
the Dalmatian coast and the river Drave, would seriously jeopardize its
position as a great power; it must be remembered, also, that
Austria-Hungary, far from decomposing, as it was commonly assumed was
happening, had been enormously increasing in vitality ever since 1878.
The means adopted by the governments of Vienna and Budapest to nullify
the plans of Serbian expansion were generally to maintain the political
_émiettement_ of the Serb race, the isolation of one group from
another, the virtually enforced emigration of Slavs on a large scale
and their substitution by German colonists, and the encouragement of
rivalry and discord between Roman Catholic Croat and Orthodox Serb. No
railways were allowed to be built in Dalmatia, communication between
Agram and any other parts of the monarchy except Fiume or Budapest was
rendered almost impossible; Bosnia and Hercegovina were shut off into a
watertight compartment and endowed with a national flag composed of the
inspiring colours of brown and buff; it was made impossible for Serbs
to visit Montenegro or for Montenegrins to visit Serbia except via
Fiume, entailing the bestowal of several pounds on the Hungarian state
steamers and railways. As for the _sandjak_ of Novi-Pazar, it was
turned into a veritable Tibet, and a legend was spread abroad that if
any foreigner ventured there he would be surely murdered by Turkish
brigands; meanwhile it was full of Viennese ladies giving picnics and
dances and tennis parties to the wasp-waisted officers of the Austrian
garrison. Bosnia and Hercegovina, on the other hand, became the model
touring provinces of Austria-Hungary, and no one can deny that their
great natural beauties were made more enjoyable by the construction of
railways, roads, and hotels. At the same time this was not a work of
pure philanthropy, and the emigration statistics are a good indication
of the joy with which the Bosnian peasants paid for an annual influx of
admiring tourists. In spite of all these disadvantages, however, the
Serbo-Croat provinces of Austria-Hungary could not be deprived of all
the benefits of living within a large and prosperous customs union,
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account