The Balkans: A History of Bulgaria—Serbia—Greece—Rumania—TurkeyHogarth, D. G. (David George)
History
The Balkans: A History of Bulgaria—Serbia—Greece—Rumania—Turkey
Hogarth, D. G. (David George)
Balkan Peninsula -- History; Eastern question (Balkan)
till 1908, is a proof, not only of the energy and earnestness of its
promoters and of the vitality of the Serbian people, but also, if any
were needed, of the extreme unpopularity of the Hapsburg régime in the
southern Slav provinces of the dual monarchy. Serbia had no help from
outside. Russia was entangled in the Far East and then in the
revolution, and though the new dynasty was approved in St. Petersburg
Russian sympathy with Serbia was at that time only lukewarm. Relations
with Austria-Hungary were of course always strained; only one single
line of railway connected the two countries, and as Austria-Hungary was
the only profitable market, for geographical reasons, for Serbian
products, Serbia could be brought to its knees at any moment by the
commercial closing of the frontier. It was a symbol of the economic
vassalage of Serbia and Montenegro that the postage between both of
these countries and any part of Austria-Hungary was ten centimes, that
for letters between Serbia and Montenegro, which had to make the long
détour through Austrian territory, was twenty-five. But though this
opened the Serbian markets to Austria, it also incidentally opened
Bosnia, when the censor could be circumvented to propaganda by pamphlet
and correspondence. Intercourse with western Europe was restricted by
distance, and, owing to dynastic reasons, diplomatic relations were
altogether suspended for several years between this country and Serbia.
The Balkan States Exhibition held in London during the summer of 1907,
to encourage trade between Great Britain and the Balkans, was hardly a
success. Italy and Serbia had nothing in common. With Montenegro even,
despite the fact that King Peter was Prince Nicholas’s son-in-law,
relations were bad. It was felt in Serbia that Prince Nicholas’s
autocratic rule acted as a brake on the legitimate development of the
national consciousness, and Montenegrin students who visited Belgrade
returned to their homes full of wild and unsuitable ideas. However, the
revolutionary tendencies, which some of them undoubtedly developed, had
no fatal results to the reigning dynasty, which continued as before to
enjoy the special favour as well as the financial support of the
Russian court, and which, looked on throughout Europe as a picturesque
and harmless institution, it would have been dangerous, as it was quite
unnecessary, to touch.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account