The banker and the bear : $b The story of a corner in lardWebster, Henry Kitchell
General
The banker and the bear : $b The story of a corner in lard
Webster, Henry Kitchell
Bankers -- Fiction; Didactic fiction; Political fiction; Social problems -- Fiction
As Dawson had suggested, Melville Sponley had a strong preference for
truth and fair dealing whenever they were practicable; but it will
not be imagined that in the course of a quarter century of commercial
privateering he had not many times committed acts as irregular and as
immoral--I am not speaking of commercial morality--as this attempt to
wreck Bagsbury’s bank. He had concealed none of these things from her,
and she had heard of them and taken her part in them with such entire
equanimity that he had quite naturally been surprised at her outburst
when she had first learned of his putting Curtin in the bank as a spy
upon John.
Harriet looked upon life from a thoroughly unmoral point of view.
Of abstract right and wrong she had little conception. So long as
Sponley’s operations were directed against men she did not know,
except as her husband’s opponents, she never applied the criterion
of fair play. But all that was changed as soon as John Bagsbury was
concerned in the fighting. She regarded him almost as a brother, her
loyalty to him was only less than her loyalty to her husband, and the
mere suspicion of what Sponley had been doing that afternoon, of the
meaning of his talk with Hauxton and of his two telephone messages, was
intolerable.
About an hour after Sponley went out, the butler knocked at her door.
“Mr. Curtin is here,” he said, “to see Mr. Sponley. He says it is
important and wishes to know when Mr. Sponley will be back.”
Harriet said that she knew nothing about it, but presently the man
returned, saying that Mr. Curtin wished to see her. She asked to be
excused, but Curtin was persistent, and once more the butler came back,
this time with a message.
“He says, will you please tell Mr. Sponley when he comes in that Mr.
Curtin has seen Mr. Hauxton and is sure he has started him off on the
right track.”
“I will take no message,” said Harriet, impatiently. “If Mr. Curtin
wishes to leave any word for Mr. Sponley, he may write a note. Don’t
come back again, whatever Mr. Curtin says.”
But though the servant obeyed her, Harriet could not banish Curtin from
her thoughts. She had always hated him, even before he had given her
cause. His covert admiration was almost nauseating, and his miserable
makeshift excuses for seeking her company when he knew that she could
barely tolerate him exasperated her. She recalled with disgust the
evening when he had forced himself into their dining room, and she
wondered that his accusation of her husband had affected her as it did;
she wished now that Sponley had sent him to prison.
His message, though she had declined to receive it, and though she
tried not to think of it, went over and over in her thoughts, and in
spite of herself she wondered what it meant. What could “the right
track” mean except the suspicion that the bank was in trouble? Why
should her husband wish Hauxton to entertain that suspicion unless he
was deliberately planning to ruin John Bagsbury? If he were--
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account