The battle-fields of Ireland, from 1688 to 1691 : $b including Limerick and Athlone, Aughrim and the Boyne. Being an outline history of the Jacobite war in Ireland, and the causes which led to itBoyle, John, active 1867
History
The battle-fields of Ireland, from 1688 to 1691 : $b including Limerick and Athlone, Aughrim and the Boyne. Being an outline history of the Jacobite war in Ireland, and the causes which led to it
Boyle, John, active 1867
Ireland -- History -- War of 1689-1691
pieces, so directed as to throw a raking fire across the pass itself,
a portion of the marsh, and the esplanade beyond it, to prevent the
enemy's enlarging there; and the remaining four pieces were placed on
his inner right, and directed over a portion of the marsh and the road
leading up to Urrachree. But before his centre there were no cannon
whatever; either because he deemed it less necessary, or that he wished
to invite the enemy's infantry to cross, where he was sure to break
them by repeated cavalry charges, and overwhelm them by his more agile
infantry while recrossing the marsh in disorder. His line being quite
an extended one for the number of troops under his control, he had no
reserve of infantry, but a choice body of cavalry was held behind the
north-western side of Kilcommodon, out of view of the enemy, within
convenient support of his right, and actually but a rear line of his
left, and extreme left at Aughrim.
As the battle of Aughrim, together with deciding the fate of Ireland
and the dynasty of the House of Stuart, had also an indirect bearing,
of scarcely secondary import, on the military affairs of the continent,
it has been a subject of much more critical comment than that
ordinarily bestowed on military events; and the historians of each
successive period, down to the present, have visited the disposition
of St. Ruth's army with praise or animadversion, each, no doubt, in
accordance with his own peculiar views of what should or should not
have been done by a general. While all approve the selection of the
ground, as manifesting a keen perception of what a defensive position
should be, nearly all censure some one or other of the arrangements
made for its defence. His design of letting the enemy cross at his
centre and beating them afterwards; the placing of his cavalry reserve
so far from his right; and his neglect of the Pass of Aughrim, which
was by nature so defensible; have been the subject of severe criticism,
and the whole plan, or that of allowing the enemy to cross at any
point, has been compared by the Duke of Berwick, to a similar error
of the celebrated Marshal Crequi, which had been attended by a great
disaster. But as the cavalry reserve had not been needed on the right
during the action, and as all the enemy's forces which crossed at the
centre had been successfully repulsed, the testimony of the duke, who
was not on the ground, and of all who sustained that view, may be
dismissed without comment. But what does really seem defective in his
plan of defence, was the neglect of the Pass of Aughrim, which could
have been rendered, with little labor, impregnable to either infantry
or cavalry; and in view of his very inferior artillery, this omission
seems totally irreconcilable, excepting on the ground that he believed
the force left for its defence entirely adequate, as indeed they should
have been, had they looked in time to their appointments.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account