The battle-fields of Ireland, from 1688 to 1691 : $b including Limerick and Athlone, Aughrim and the Boyne. Being an outline history of the Jacobite war in Ireland, and the causes which led to itBoyle, John, active 1867
History
The battle-fields of Ireland, from 1688 to 1691 : $b including Limerick and Athlone, Aughrim and the Boyne. Being an outline history of the Jacobite war in Ireland, and the causes which led to it
Boyle, John, active 1867
Ireland -- History -- War of 1689-1691
The next day Ginckle encamped on the heights of Kilcommodon and buried
his dead. The Irish slain, who strewed the hill and lay scattered over
the country for miles, were stripped and left unburied, to be "devoured
by the wild dogs and birds of prey." The country people fled the
vicinity of the British army, and retired to the woods and mountains
as their only refuge. The body of St. Ruth, according to the English
annalist, was stripped and thrown into a bog. A more recent and better
authority says, that "by tradition well attested, his ashes lie in the
roofless church of Athunree, beside those of Lord Galway, who fell upon
the same field of battle." There is, however, reason to doubt both, and
the writer is aware that the people of the locality where the battle
was fought, directed by tradition, point to a few stunted white thorns,
to the west of the hill, towards Loughrea, beneath which, they say,
rest the ashes of this great but unfortunate general.
It is painful to speculate on the cause that left the Irish army
without direction after the death of St. Ruth. Many have endeavored to
explain it, but all--as well those who doubt Sarsfield's presence on
the field, as those who maintain the contrary,--are lost in conjecture,
and none who participated in the battle and survived it, has placed
the matter beyond speculation. So leaving that point as time has
left it, what appears most strange in the connection, is the absence
of all command at such a conjuncture. The disposition of the Irish
troops, though dexterous, was simple. The day was all but won. The
foiling of Talmash would have been the completion of victory. A force
sufficient was on his front; a reserve more than ample to overwhelm
him was on its way to the ground--nay, drawn up and even ready for
the word. The few British troops that held a lodgement in the hedges
at the base of the hill, were completely at the mercy of those above
them. It required no omniscient eye to see this, nor a voice from the
clouds to impel them forward, and surely no military etiquette weighed
a feather in opposition to the fate of a nation. Any officer of note
could have directed the movement, and many of experience and approved
courage witnessed the crisis. Yet in this emergency, all the hard-won
laurels of the day were tarnished, and land and liberty were lost by
default! Nor can the rashness of St. Ruth, his reticence as to his
plans, his misunderstanding with Sarsfield, nor the absence of the
latter, justify the want of intrepid action among those present. This
stands unexplained and inexplicable, nor will the flippant appeal to
Providence, whose ways are too frequently offered as an excuse for
human misconduct, answer here. The want of ammunition at such a moment,
was, no doubt, of some import, but the concurrence of events too
plainly indicates that Aughrim was won by the skill of St. Ruth and the
gallantry of his troops, and that it was lost through want of decision
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account