The battle-fields of Ireland, from 1688 to 1691 : $b including Limerick and Athlone, Aughrim and the Boyne. Being an outline history of the Jacobite war in Ireland, and the causes which led to itBoyle, John, active 1867
History
The battle-fields of Ireland, from 1688 to 1691 : $b including Limerick and Athlone, Aughrim and the Boyne. Being an outline history of the Jacobite war in Ireland, and the causes which led to it
Boyle, John, active 1867
Ireland -- History -- War of 1689-1691
some French engineers and matrosses to begin the attack. As I was not
pleased with the business, any more than with the new general, * * I
asked for the command against Enniskillen, and obtained it, and left
the camp on the 21st of June, with four hundred horse dragoons, and
marched to Cavan Park."
The Parliament which assembled in Dublin, in obedience to the king's
call, had high and solemn duties to perform, and seems to have been
fully impressed with their importance. The country was impoverished;
its treasury was empty; its banking-system was completely unhinged;
and, as money was the great necessity of the hour, little could be
done towards the support of the army until the financial system of the
country was established on a satisfactory basis. Though the Williamites
of Ulster had fallen away before the national troops, they had still
two very important strongholds, Enniskillen and Derry, in their
possession; and hostilities might be protracted until the arrival of an
invading army, which the king's English agents apprised him might be
soon expected, and to raise and equip an army able to cope with it was
the real business of the session.
But the Parliament was not constituted for that expeditious legislation
that the king expected. In the Upper House there were no Catholic
prelates, and the Protestant lords, spiritual and temporal, greatly
outnumbered the Catholic peers.
In the Lower House the Catholic element greatly preponderated,
and conflicting opinions are never slow to arise in the greatest
emergencies. The Protestant representatives very naturally wished to
know whither the king's reforms tended; and the Catholic members, with
a desire quite as reasonable, wanted to have their rights secured by
constitutional guarantees. The discussions arising in consequence of
these different views were long, and not free from religious rancor,
and so, much of the time--short enough for the pressing duty of the
hour--was wasted on questions that might have been better left for
future deliberation. Grattan, in alluding to this Parliament eighty
years later, says: "Though Papists, they were not slaves; they wrung
a constitution from King James before they accompanied him to the
field."[15] This was the view of a great statesman; but yet we think
that the first and only duty of that Parliament should have been to
grant, even to wring, money from the country, to remove their king's
dependence on the bounty of France, and enable him to support an army
equal to the necessity of the time; and this it undoubtedly could have
done, had the Catholic members been as liberal in voting supplies to
James, as their Protestant colleagues were afterwards in casting the
wealth of the country at the feet of William. These rights that Grattan
appreciated so much--the rights he won himself--where are they? The
great duty was to beat the enemy and leave the rest to time.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account