The Bay State Monthly — Volume 2, No. 2, November, 1884Various
History
The Bay State Monthly — Volume 2, No. 2, November, 1884
Various
Massachusetts -- Periodicals; New England -- Periodicals
With the accession of business brought by the corporations at Lowell,
the prospect for increased dividends in the future was extremely
encouraging. The golden age of the canal appeared close at hand; but the
fond hopes of the proprietors were once more destined to disappointment.
Even the genius of James Sullivan had not foreseen the railway
locomotive. In 1829 a petition was presented to the Legislature for the
survey of a railroad from Boston to Lowell. The interests of the canal
were seriously involved. A committee was promptly chosen to draw up for
presentation to the General Court "a remonstrance of the Proprietors of
Middlesex Canal, against the grant of a charter to build a railroad from
Boston to Lowell." This remonstrance, signed by William Sullivan, Joseph
Coolidge, and George Hallett, bears date of Boston, Feb. 12, 1830, and
conclusively shows how little the business men of fifty years ago
anticipated the enormous development of our resources consequent upon
the application of steam to transportation:--
The remonstrants take pleasure in declaring, that they join in the
common sentiment of surprise and commendation, that any
intelligence and enterprise should have raised so rapidly and so
permanently, such establishments as are seen at Lowell. The
proprietors of these works have availed themselves of _the canal_,
for their transportation for all articles, except in the winter
months ... and every effort has been made by this corporation to
afford every facility, it was hoped and believed, to the entire
satisfaction of the Lowell proprietors. The average annual amount
of tolls paid by these proprietors has been only about four
thousand dollars. It is believed no safer or cheaper mode of
conveyance can ever be established, nor any so well adapted for
carrying heavy and bulky articles. To establish therefore a
_substitute_ for the canal alongside of it, and in many places
within a few rods of it, and to do that which the canal was made to
do, seems to be a measure not called for by any exigency, nor one
which the Legislature can permit, without implicitly declaring that
all investments of money in public enterprises must be subjected to
the will of any applicants who think that they may benefit
themselves without regard to older enterprises, which have a claim
to protection from public authority. With regard, then, to
transportation of tonnage goods, the means exist for all but the
winter months, as effectually as any that can be provided.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account