The Bayeux Tapestry ElucidatedBruce, J. Collingwood (John Collingwood)
History
The Bayeux Tapestry Elucidated
Bruce, J. Collingwood (John Collingwood)
Bayeux tapestry
[6] _See_ Note B. at the end of the volume.
[7] Taylor’s Wace, p. xxviii.
[8] Archæologia, vol. xix., p. 186.
[9] Strutt thus disposes of a difficulty which may occur to some
minds.--“If any one should say, by way of objection to this
established rule, that though the illuminator has not given us the
customs, habits, &c., of those people he designed to picture out,
yet is it not most likely that such dresses as are given should be
fictitious, agreeable rather to his own wild fancy than to the real
customs and habits of his own times? To answer their objection, (and
that because the chief materials of the present work are collected
from the ancient MSS.) the reader must be informed, that many of these
MSS. (especially such as are illuminated) were done as presents, or
at the command of kings and noblemen, who are generally represented
in the frontispiece in their proper habits receiving the particular
MS. done for them from the author, and they are generally pictured
attended by their court, or retinue. That these figures should be
habited in the true dress of the times will not be doubted; and
then, as far as the anonymous illuminations which may chance to
follow in the MS. shall agree with those figures in the frontispiece,
so far they may be allowed as authentic; other MSS. were done for
particular abbeys and monasteries, in the embellishments of which no
pains were spared. But a still greater proof of the authenticity of
these delineations is, that on examining all the illuminated MSS. of
the same century together, which, tho’ various, every one written
and ornamented by different hands, yet on comparing the several
delineations with each other, they will be found to agree in every
particular of dress, customs, &c., even in the minutiæ, which perfect
similitude it would have been impossible to have preserved, had not
some sure standard been regularly taken for the whole; therefore the
fancy of the painter will be found to have little share in these
valuable delineations. Besides, these pictures constantly agree
with the description of the habits and customs of the same period,
collected from the old historians.”--_Strutt’s Manners, Customs, &c.,
of the Inhabitants of England_, vol. i, p. 3.
[10] Taylor’s Wace, p. 162.
[11] Ibid. p. 163. n.
[12] “All have hitherto treated the Bayeux Tapestry as a ‘Monument
of the Conquest of England,’ following therein M. Lancelot, and
speaking of it as an unfinished work: whereas it is an apologetical
history of the claims of William to the crown of England, and of the
breach of faith, and fall of Harold; and is a perfect and finished
action.”--_Mr. Hudson Gurney_, Archæologia, vol. xvii., p. 361.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account