The best short stories of 1922, and the yearbook of the American short story
General
The best short stories of 1922, and the yearbook of the American short story
American fiction -- 20th century; Short stories -- 20th century -- Bibliography; Short stories -- 20th century -- Indexes; Short stories, American
“It’s queer,” Allis mused; “you and I are the only ones of the crowd
who know what happened; and the one thing we are most anxious for is
that everyone concerned--even Fenwick himself--should be convinced of
some explanation we know is wrong. We want Mrs. Medford to believe
Mrs. Conway; I want Maud to believe what I said here a while ago; and
I even want Fenwick to believe that the dead communicate. We’re a
scientific lot, aren’t we?”
“I’m not sure I wouldn’t rather believe any of those things than
believe what I do,” I said grimly. I remembered Fenwick’s face.
“Exactly. Poor science!”
Mrs. Allis returned, and I bade my host and hostess good night. This
time I did not go back again.
[13] Copyright, 1922, by The Metropolitan Magazine Company.
Copyright, 1923, by Katharine Fullerton Gerould.
WINKELBURG[14]
By BEN HECHT
(From _The Smart Set_)
I
There was never a man as irritating as Winkelburg. He was an
encyclopedia of misfortunes. Everything that can happen to a man had
happened to him. He had lost his family, his money and his health. He
was, in short, a man completely broken--tall, thin, with a cadaverous
face out of which shone two huge lustreless eyes. He walked with an
angular crawl that reminded one of the emaciated flies one sees at
the beginning of winter. That was Winkelburg to a dot--a creature
perversely alive, dragging itself across an illimitable expanse of
flypaper.
It was one of Winkelburg’s worst habits to appear at unexpected
moments. But, perhaps, any appearances he might have made would have
had this irritating quality of unexpectedness. One was never looking
forward to him, and thus the sight of his wan, uncomfortable smile,
his lustreless eyes, his tenacious crawl was invariably an irritating
surprise.
I will be frank. It was Winkelburg’s misfortune which first attracted
me. I listened to his story avidly. He talked in slow words and
there was intelligence in the man. He was able to perceive himself,
not only as a pain-racked, starving human, but he glimpsed with his
large, tired eyes his relation to things outside himself.
It appeared that the man had been lying in a hall bedroom for two
weeks dying. An embittered landlady to whom he owed three months
rent had tended him. I fancy she was torn between a hope that the
miserable fool would die and give her a chance to rent the room to
a more profitable customer and a more optimistic greed. He might
recover, get a job and pay her the three months rent he owed.
Winkelburg wrote to me about it. It was my first knowledge of the
man. He offered his experiences as material for one of the daily
stories I was writing for the _News_. His letter was a document. In
it he recounted in good English and in a few lines the history of his
life.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account