To my mind, nothing was more natural than the encounter between John
Fordham and Jack, nothing more natural than the instantaneous
conclusions drawn by the combatants--Jack believing his antagonist to
be an officer of the law, and Fordham believing his to be a ruffian,
bent upon robbery or murder. In many respects Jack's disclosures
corroborated the account written by Fordham, but there were important
gaps that required to be filled in. Jack did not admit any lapses of
memory; he went straight on from beginning to end without hesitation.
Fordham was less confident, and his admission of a failure of memory
at a vital point of his story would lead to the presumption that his
memory was not to be depended upon in other points. Whether judge and
jury would accept Jack's evidence with as much faith as I did remained
to be seen. He was a tainted witness, and an accessory to the fact of
the murder. Then, again, I had pledged myself that he should not be
harmed. If he were brought forward in the present position of the case
he would certainly come to grief. For a time, therefore, he must be
kept in the background. Only through the principal being charged with
the crime could he be accepted as Queen's evidence, and even then his
statements would require corroboration. Morgan could corroborate them,
but would he, being himself in danger? And before Morgan could be
produced, he had to be found. Maxwell, also. It was not likely that
either of them would present himself of his own accord. Well, they
must be hunted down.
Before I left Jack I questioned him upon various matters, testing him,
as it were, and putting him in the witness-box. There was one
statement especially which emphatically needed confirmation or
refutation, and this I did not introduce till the end. There was no
prevarication in his answers; his description of Louis' personal
appearance, with the scar on his forehead which flushed and reddened
when he was excited, tallied with that given by Fordham, and he
adhered unflinchingly to his account of the last scene of the tragedy.
A few of my questions were such as would be put to him in the
witness-box under the fire of cross-examination.
"You say your back was turned during the altercation between Louis and
Maxwell?"
"Yes."
"And Morgan's also?"
"Yes."
"You heard them threaten each other!"
"Yes."
"Then you heard a scream?"
"Yes."
"And turning, saw Louis fall to the ground with a knife sticking in
him?"
"Yes."
"But you did not see the blow struck?"
"No."
"It might have been done by himself?"
"Now, look 'ere, guv'nor," said Jack, slipping out of the imaginary
witness-box, "is that likely?"
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account