The Better Germany in War Time: Being Some Facts Towards FellowshipPicton, Harold W. (Harold Williams)
History
The Better Germany in War Time: Being Some Facts Towards Fellowship
Picton, Harold W. (Harold Williams)
World War, 1914-1918 -- Hospitals, charities, etc.; World War, 1914-1918 -- Prisoners and prisons, German
The food material is excellent and the cooking, as I have
stated, is attended to by the prisoners themselves, those doing
the cooking receiving payment from the British fund, with the
exception of 150M. weekly allowed for cooks’ wages by the German
authorities. The prisoners are given, if they choose, a
bread-card, and are allowed to purchase extra bread—the
Kriegsbrod, which we all use in Germany and which is quite
palatable—at the price of 55 pfennige a loaf. Food also, as I
have stated, can be purchased in the canteen at prices very much
less than food can be purchased in Berlin, and at very much less
than cost.—[Miscel, No. 3 (1916)].
The low price at the canteen, was, however, I take it, owing to the
existence of the camp fund contributed to by the British Government.
Lord Newton spoke in the House of Lords on February 22, 1917, on the
question of prisoners of war. The following extract is from the _Daily
Telegraph_ report:
There was nothing to be gained by exaggerating the conditions of
prisoners in Germany or elsewhere. There was neither sense nor
truth in representing, as was constantly done, that Ruhleben was
a sort of unspeakable hell upon earth, and that a British
internment camp was a kind of paradise compared with it. He
deplored the hardship that these men underwent, but it was a
great mistake to suppose that these civilians at Ruhleben were
undergoing greater hardships than those being endured by our
military prisoners. Like anyone who ventured to state the facts,
he would no doubt be accused of being a pro-German, but
certainly the conditions at Ruhleben had greatly improved
recently. These conditions had improved, not on account of any
action on the part of the German Government, but rather on
account of their inaction. They had permitted the British there
to organise on their own lines and make the conditions
tolerable. Anyone could satisfy himself as to the conditions,
because there were men who had arrived here recently who could
give the fullest information. In addition, they were able to
form their own opinions to a certain extent from independent
testimony, for example, the visit of Bishop Bury. He could not
understand why this prelate had been subjected to so much attack
on the part of certain persons in this country. He went to
Germany by permission of the German Government. He went to
Ruhleben, lived in the camp, and was able to see what the
conditions were. He reported exactly what he saw, and was
thereupon denounced as not only being an inaccurate person but
obviously pro-German.
ABSENCE ON LEAVE.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account