The Bible of nature : $b or, The principles of secularism. A contribution to the religion of the futureOswald, Felix L. (Felix Leopold)
Religion
The Bible of nature : $b or, The principles of secularism. A contribution to the religion of the future
Oswald, Felix L. (Felix Leopold)
Secularism
The conversion of Rome, which theologians are fond of representing as
the crowning miracle of Christianity, was a natural consequence of its
pessimistic tendencies, which could not fail to recommend themselves to
the instincts of a decrepit generation. “Worn-out sensualists consoled
themselves with the hope of a better hereafter. Cowards pleased
themselves with the idea of fulfilling the duty of meek submission to
the injustice of the ‘powers that be.’ Monastic drones denounced the
worldliness of industrial enterprises. Physical indolence welcomed the
discovery that ‘bodily exercise profiteth but little.’ Envious
impotence insisted on the duty of self-abasement. Transgressors against
the health-laws of Nature relied upon the efficacy of the prayer-cure.
Stall-fed priests sneered at the lean philosopher who wasted his time
upon laborious inquiries, while he might wax fat on faith and the
sacrifices of the pious. The demon-dogma was a godsend to the spiritual
poverty of the elect. The so-called scholars of the Galilean church,
who could not encounter the pagan philosophers on their own ground,
found it very convenient to postulate a spook for every unknown
phenomenon.... Despots before long recognized the mistake of
persecuting a creed which inculcated the duty of passive submission to
oppressors” (Secret of the East, p. 54).
They also recognized the advantage of a spiritual excuse for the infamy
of their ingratitude to the secular benefactors of mankind. Cæsar and
Trajan treated the humblest centurion as a friend rather than as a
servant. Constantine and Justinian treated the ablest ministers like
slaves who can be forced to toil, and turned out to starve after having
worn out their strength in the service of the Lord’s anointed.
Belisarius, after repeatedly saving his master from well-deserved ruin,
was sacrificed to the spite of a crowned harlot, and left to beg his
bread in the streets of the city which his valor alone had for years
protected from the rage of hostile armies. Aetius, who had saved all
Europe by stemming the torrent of Hunnish conquest, was treated like a
rebellious slave for refusing to betray his brave allies, and the
stipulated pay of his veterans was squandered on pimps and clerical
parasites. Charles Martel, whose heroism turned the scales against the
power of the invading Moriscos, was openly reviled by the very priests
who owed him the preservation of their lives, as well as of their
livings; his image was dragged in the mire, his soul consigned to the
pit of torment—all for having defrayed the costs of his campaign by
tithing prelates as well as laymen. Columbus was loaded with chains by
the pious prince whose castles he had filled with the treasures of a
new world; the philosopher Vanini was betrayed to death by a Christian
spy who had for years enjoyed his confidence and his hospitality. John
Huss was surrendered by the imperial priest-slave whose own hand had
signed the document of his safe-conduct.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account