The Bible of nature : $b or, The principles of secularism. A contribution to the religion of the futureOswald, Felix L. (Felix Leopold)
Religion
The Bible of nature : $b or, The principles of secularism. A contribution to the religion of the future
Oswald, Felix L. (Felix Leopold)
Secularism
The experience of the last sixteen centuries has made priestcraft
almost a synonym of intolerance; and yet it would be a mistake to
suppose that the interests of Freethought are incompatible with the
survival of any system of supernatural religion. The myths of
polytheism were for ages accepted as the basis of a creed enjoying all
the prerogatives and emoluments of an established religion, but the
priests of that religion had no need of protecting their prestige by
the butchery of heretics. With all their absurdities, the rites of
their creed were essentially a worship of Nature, naturally attractive
to all lovers of earth and life, and by their harmlessness conciliating
the favor of philosophers who might have studied the baneful tendencies
of a different creed—a creed which could propagate its dogmas only by
an unremitting war against the natural instincts of the human race, and
by constant intrigues against the protests of human reason. “The
Nature-worshiping Greeks repeated the harmless myths and practiced the
merry rites of their creed for centuries without troubling themselves
about the myths and rites of their neighbors. Their superstition
differed from that of the church as the inspired love of Nature differs
from the ecstatic fury of her enemies, as the day-dream of a happy
child differs from the fever-dream of a gloomy fanatic. ‘Procul
Profani!’ was the cry of the Eleusinian priests. They had more
followers than they wanted. Their joy-loving creed could dispense with
autos-da-fé. The Hebrews, in stress of famine, conquered a little strip
of territory between Arabia and the Syrian desert, and then tried their
best to live in peace with heaven and earth, and their sects contented
themselves with metaphorical rib-roastings. The Saracens spread their
conquests from Spain to the Ganges, but their wars had a physical,
rather than metaphysical, purpose. They needed land, and made a better
use of it than the former occupants. They contented themselves with
assessing dissenters, and did not deem it necessary to assassinate
them. But the Galilean pessimists could not afford to tolerate an
unconverted neighbor. To the enemies of Nature the happiness of an
earth-loving, garden-planting, and science-promoting nation was an
intolerable offense: reason had to be sacrificed to faith, health and
happiness to the cross, and earth to heaven” (The Secret of the East,
p. 62).
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account