The binding of the Nile and the new SoudanPeel, Sidney Cornwallis
History
The binding of the Nile and the new Soudan
Peel, Sidney Cornwallis
Irrigation -- Egypt; Nile River; Sudan (Region)
Another most interesting case is related by the Legal Adviser as
having recently occurred in Dongola Province. Taha Ali and Ahmed
Hamad carried on business in partnership as butchers, and Taha kept
the purse. One day Taha told his partner that ten and a half dollars
belonging to the partnership had been stolen. But Ahmed did not
believe him, and roundly accused him of stealing the money himself. A
violent dispute arose, but at last they agreed to refer the matter
to a holy man then residing in the neighbourhood. This holy man was
a fakir belonging to Timbuctoo, who had made the pilgrimage to Mecca,
and was now returning. At first he was very reluctant to interfere; it
was no business of his, he said; they should go before the mamur. But
the more he refused the more eagerly they insisted. They even said
that if he would not, it was because he could not. It was a poor sort
of fakir that could not find out a little thing like that, and they
would lose no time in proclaiming the fact. At last he consented to
act. First he copied out some passages from some religious books
which he had with him on a native writing-board with European
copying-ink. Then he washed off the writing into a bowl with bread
and water, and divided the bread and water between the two, telling
them that the one in the wrong would shortly become very ill. Each
man consumed his portion of the mess and went away. An hour or two
later Taha Ali was seized with violent pains in the stomach, and,
returning to the fakir, confessed that it was he who had stolen the
money. But in spite of his confession the pains grew worse, and he
died the same day. The authorities stepped in, and the fakir was put
on his trial for poisoning. The facts of the case were undisputed,
and the fakir himself gave evidence on his own behalf. He pointed
out that he had only undertaken to investigate the affair very
reluctantly, as he was well aware that it was not his business,
but he could not damage his reputation as a holy man. He had adopted
the best method of discovering the truth. The man’s death was the
act of God, not his. As for the suggestion that the copying-ink was
poisonous, he was willing on the spot to drink up the remainder of
it, the bottle being still about half full. The medical examination
revealed no sign of poisoning, and the case was referred to Khartoum.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account