The binding of the Nile and the new SoudanPeel, Sidney Cornwallis
History
The binding of the Nile and the new Soudan
Peel, Sidney Cornwallis
Irrigation -- Egypt; Nile River; Sudan (Region)
His end was characteristic of the fate of those who, in those dark
days, dared to serve the best interests of Egypt. In spite of his
successful administration of his province, he found his position
made impossible for him after Gordon’s departure. In September,
1880, he resigned. After nearly perishing in the sudd, which blocked
his steamers, he reached Khartoum. But there, under the new regime,
he was no welcome guest. He struggled on to Suez, where he soon
after died, unrecognised and unrewarded, utterly worn out by his
exertions and privations. When such a man met with such treatment, it
was clear that there was no chance of the regeneration of the Soudan
under Egyptian rule. The last ray of hope had been extinguished with
Gordon’s departure.
CHAPTER XV
THE PAST—_Continued_
Gordon’s successor at Khartoum was Raouf Pasha, the very man
whom he had dismissed from his post as Governor of Harrar two years
before for oppression and other malpractices. The appointment was
not of good augury, and the improvements which had been made in
the administration fell rapidly to pieces. The slave-traders began
to lift their heads; once more the caravans, with their miserable
human freight, began to journey towards Egypt or the Red Sea; once
more the horde of tax-collectors felt themselves set free to levy
their exactions at their will. The critical position of affairs in
Egypt itself was reflected in the Soudan. Economy and retrenchment
were the order of the day; under such a Government they were not
likely to mean anything else than an increase in the burden on the
provinces. Colonel Stewart, in his report on the Soudan, published
in 1883, graphically describes the character of the irregular
Bashi-Bazouks who were employed to collect the taxes.
‘Many, if not most of these men,’ he says, ‘are very indifferent
characters. They are mostly swaggering bullies, robbing, plundering,
and ill-treating the people with impunity. Probably for every
pound that reaches the Treasury they rob an equal amount from the
people. They are a constant menace to public tranquillity, and
before any amelioration can be expected they must be got rid of. As
soldiers they are valueless, having no discipline, nor, except in
talk, do they exhibit any extraordinary courage. Compared with that
of negroes and Egyptians their pay is high.’
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account