The binding of the Nile and the new SoudanPeel, Sidney Cornwallis
History
The binding of the Nile and the new Soudan
Peel, Sidney Cornwallis
Irrigation -- Egypt; Nile River; Sudan (Region)
Great as Gordon’s influence had once been, it was impossible for
it to outweigh the religious fervour of the Mahdists. His position
was immensely weakened when it became known that his final object
was the evacuation of the Soudan. Many waverers felt that they
must in the end be left at the mercy of the Mahdi, and wavered
no more. Gordon’s view was that the only way to evacuate the
Soudan with honour and safety was to hold on to Khartoum, crush
the enemy if possible, and then to retire, leaving behind some
form of government capable of maintaining order. The only man, in
his opinion, capable of such a position was Zubehr. But his views
were not shared, perhaps hardly understood, by the authorities at
home. The British Government, committed sorely against their will
to a military occupation of Egypt, and earnestly desiring to make
it as short as possible, were most unwilling to undertake further
responsibilities in the Soudan. The conflict of opinion produced
paralysis. Neither policy was completely adopted. British troops
moved up to Assouan. In the Eastern Soudan the disaster of El Teb,
where once more the Egyptian troops under Valentine Baker allowed
themselves to be slaughtered like sheep, and the fall of Sinkat,
forced the Government to take military action. General Graham,
starting from Suakin, won brilliant victories at El Teb and Tamai,
and relieved the garrison at Tokar. But the proposal to make a dash on
Berber, now in the hands of the Mahdists, was vetoed, and Graham’s
troops retired. Meanwhile in the Nile Valley the golden hours were
flying fast. Gordon stood firmly by his policy of holding Khartoum,
partly in the hope, growing daily fainter, of being able to turn the
scale by his own personal exertions and influence, partly with the
intention of forcing the British Government to change what seemed
to him their disastrous and dishonourable policy of abandoning
the Soudan to the rebels. On their side, the Government drifted,
hesitating and temporizing, reluctant to reverse their settled
policy of peace. And so the tragic game was played. Month by month
the investment of Khartoum grew closer. Slatin Bey in Darfur, after
fighting twenty-seven battles in the course of 1883, was deserted
by his troops and forced to surrender. El Fasher was reduced in the
following January. In the Bahr el Ghazal, Lupton Bey, the successor
of Gessi, after holding out for eighteen months, shared the same
fate, and was brought in a prisoner to Omdurman. In the east the
garrison of Gedaref made terms with the enemy. The Mahdi was able
to concentrate his forces at the important point.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account