The Biological Problem of To-day: Preformation Or Epigenesis?: The Basis of a Theory of Organic DevelopmentHertwig, Oscar
Science
The Biological Problem of To-day: Preformation Or Epigenesis?: The Basis of a Theory of Organic Development
Hertwig, Oscar
Developmental biology; Embryology; Genetics
In my theory two assumptions of totally contrasting nature are made: I
assume a germplasm of high and specific organisation, and I assume that
this is transformed into the adult product by epigenetic agencies. To a
certain extent, therefore, I reconcile the opposition between evolution and
epigenesis, these opponents so prominent last century.
But my theory does not pretend to explain all the many problems involved
in the course of organic development. In this respect it differs from
Weismann's doctrine of determinants, as that is a closed system, finding
within itself a formal explanation of all development. So far it seems to
me an abandonment of explanation rather than an explanation; for it
explains by signs and tokens that elude verification and experiment, and
that cannot encounter concrete investigation. His explanation is no more
than a description, in other words, of the visible events of development.
To be more than this, it would be necessary to explain how in each case the
biophores and determinants and ancestral plasms are constituted, and how
they are arranged in the architecture of the germplasm so as to produce the
development of the egg-cell in this or that fashion. It must, at the least,
offer such possibilities as the structural formulæ of chemists offer. But
in the present stage of our knowledge Weismann's method is unpromising; it
merely transfers to an invisible region the solution of a problem that we
are trying to solve, at least partially, by investigation of visible
characters; and in the invisible region it is impossible to apply the
methods of science. So, by its very nature, it is barren to investigation,
as there is no means by which investigation may put it to the proof. In
this respect it is like its predecessor, the theory of preformation of the
eighteenth century.
FOOTNOTES:
[17] The second section contains references to the following treatises:
C. V. NAEGELI: _Mechanisch-physiologische Theorie der Abstammungslehre_
(1884).
HERTWIG, OSCAR: _Lehrbuch der Entwicklungsgeschichte des Menschen und der
Wirbelthiere_; 4th edit.
SACHS: _Lectures on Plant Physiology_; English edition, Clarendon Press.
VOECHTING: _Ueber die Theilbarkeit im Pflanzenreich und die Wirkung innerer
und äusserer Kräfte auf Organbildung an Pflanzentheilen._ _Pflüger's
Archiv._, vol. xv., 1877.
Ibid.: _Ueber Organbildung im Pflanzenreich_, 1, 2; Bonn, 1878, 1884.
GOEBEL: _Beiträge zur Morphologie und Physiologie des Blattes._ _Bot.
Zeit._, 1880.
PFLÜGER: _Die teleologische Mechanik der lebendigen Natur_; Bonn, 1877.
MAUPAS: _Sur le déterminisme de la sexualité chez l'Hydatina senta._
_Comptes rendus des séances de l'Académie des Sciences_; Paris, 1891.
WEISMANN: _Die Allmacht der Naturzüchtung. Eine Erwiderung an Herbert
Spencer_; Jena, 1893.
HERBERT SPENCER: _A Rejoinder to Professor Weismann._ _Contemporary
Review_, 1893.
Ibid.: _Die Unzulänglichkeit der 'Natürlichen Zuchtwahl.'_ _Biol.
Centralblatt_, vol. xiv., No. 6.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account