“The combination of circumstances that make up a fit nestling place for
it, may be well understood from the following selection of a burrow,
by a pair of birds, in the garden of a friend. A box filled with earth
had been placed on tressels within water, for growing lettuces from
seed, or rather for saving the seed, whilst vegetating, from the
depredations of ants. The box had performed its office;—the lettuces
had been transplanted, and the mould remained in undisturbed fallow.
The box having a knot-hole in the side, through this hole a pair of
Todies burrowed a gallery into the heart of the mould, built a nest,
and reared a family of young ones. They were assiduous sitters, the
male and female relieving each other. Though they attracted a good deal
of attention, and were not unfrequently disturbed by the curiosity of
visitors, they steadfastly pursued their family affairs, and showed
surprising vigilance and caution in escaping out of their cavern, when
they were either watched, or attempts were made to catch them. They
never failed to profit by the moment when attention was withdrawn from
them, either to come from out of their cave, or to dart into it. On
opening the earth after the young had fled, there was found a capacious
winding gallery into the centre of the box, ending in a circular
lodging, in which was contained the nest, composed of fibrous roots and
cotton.
“There is such an obvious similarity between the Kingfisher and the
Tody, particularly the brilliant blue and green European Kingfisher,
that few who are acquainted with both fail to recognise their affinity.
The brilliant plumage of the two birds; the patient watchfulness with
which they both sit on some exposed twig to await the vagrant prey;
their short flight from station to station; and their repeated return
to the same spot;—independent of that intimate resemblance in the
structure of their extremities, which led Brisson, Latreille, and
Cuvier, to arrange the Halcyons in company with the Todies, would
induce one to conclude that there was some propinquity in their
natures, without any great knowledge of Natural History. The difference
of the element in which they severally seek their food, does not
widen the affinity between them, for the Jacamars of America, and the
Martin-chasseurs of Africa, or King-hunters, as they are called, to
distinguish them, in their pursuit of a terrestrial or aërial prey,
from the Kingfishers or Martin-pecheurs, which seek theirs only in
the water,—are placed in no less near a relationship of habits and
structure. The similarity is remarkably increased, when we go on to the
habit of burrowing, which prevails alike among all these birds, and to
the syndactyle form of the feet. These resemblances remove all doubt
about their classification.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account