The Birth of the Nation, Jamestown, 1607Pryor, Sara Agnes Rice
History
The Birth of the Nation, Jamestown, 1607
Pryor, Sara Agnes Rice
Virginia -- History -- Colonial period, ca. 1600-1775
"Who would live at home idly or think in himself any worth, to live only
to eat, drink and sleep, and so die?"
"Who can desire more content that hath small means or but merits to
advance his fortunes than to tread and plant the ground he hath purchased
by the hazard of his life? If he have but the taste of virtue and
magnanimity, what to such a mind can be more pleasant than planting and
building a foundation for his posterity, got from the rude earth by God's
blessing and his own industry without prejudice to any?"
"What so truly suits with honour and honesty as the discovering things
unknown, erecting towns, peopling countries, informing the ignorant,
reforming things unjust, teaching virtue and gain to our native mother
country:--so far from wronging any as to cause posterity to remember thee,
and, remembering thee, ever honour that remembrance with praise?"
"What can a man with faith in religion do more agreeable to God than to
seek to convert these poor savages to Christ and humanity?"
These are the words of a Christian soldier. Men of his temperament,
however, are never regarded with indifference. They are loved devotedly or
hated relentlessly. One writer of his day calls him a "dear noble captain
and loyal heart"; another, "a wonder of nature, mirror of our clime"; "a
soldier of valorous policy and judgment"; another says of him:--
"I never knew a warrior but thee
From wine, tobacco, debts, dice, oaths so free."
On the other hand, his contemporaries brand him as "tyrant and
conspirator"; "full of the exaggerations and self-assertions of an
adventurer"; "a Gascon and a beggar." The adverse opinions, for some
mysterious reason, have crystallized around the Pocahontas incident, and
so eager are his critics to disprove the assertion that she saved John
Smith's life, they would like to believe she never existed at all! The
simple truth is that in the first two of his letters he omitted the fact,
in the third he related it. This inconsistency was observed in 1866 by Dr.
Charles Deane of Massachusetts. Until then no one had doubted the truth
of the story.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account