The Black Hawk War Including a Review of Black Hawk's LifeStevens, Frank Everett
History
The Black Hawk War Including a Review of Black Hawk's Life
Stevens, Frank Everett
Black Hawk War, 1832; Black Hawk, Sauk chief, 1767-1838
“Quash-quah-ing, the Jumping Fish, a British chief: ‘My Father and my
Friends: All the chiefs are dead and the young men have told me to
speak for them. You tell the truth about the treaty at Prairie du
Chien, but the Menominees struck us first and we struck back. The
chiefs have said, “Do not let us strike first.” What do you expect us
to do? We only do what our old chiefs have told us. The chiefs that
have spoken told the truth; but what can we do when our young men will
not listen?’
“Keokuk, he that has been everywhere, a Sac brave:
“‘You tell the truth about the treaty at Prairie du Chien. I was there
myself; but you tell a little more. After the treaty was concluded at
Prairie du Chien, I and four chiefs went to General Clark and Colonel
Morgan and said to them, “What will you do with those that strike
first?” They told us that the principal men should be delivered. This
is what I mean when I say “a little more.” It was then discovered and
explained that the word “principal” had not been interpreted.
“‘My old man (pointing to Quash-quah-ing) did not understand. After
the affair of last year we went to General Clark and Colonel Morgan
and, notwithstanding the attack of the Menominees, they made all good
and even. But now, if what they did and what we have now done was put
in scales, it would balance. I expect it is because our names are Sacs
and Foxes that you make a noise about it. When we do the least thing,
you make a great noise about it. Last winter I went to the Missouri.
There an Ioway killed an Omaha. Why was he not hung? They were at the
treaty. The reason I say so much against you is because our hearts are
good. Our chiefs were killed with the pipe of peace and the wampum in
their hands. This is all I have to say. As for my chiefs and braves,
they will do as they please. I have said all that I have to say; but
why do you not let us fight? Your whites are constantly fighting. They
are now fighting way east. Why do you not interfere with them? Why do
you not let us be as the Great Spirit made us, and let us settle our
difficulties?’”
As this speech of Keokuk’s was received by the Indians with applause for
its ingenuity, the commanding officer thought it proper to add that such
treaties as were made at Prairie du Chien were frequently made between
the white nations at the east and enforced.
That it was not because they were Sacs that the present demand was made,
but because it was not wished that the Sacs would become liars. That as
it regarded the Omahas, whenever they demanded redress for the murder
from the United States, it would then be time to interfere. That the
affair did not concern the Sacs.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account