The Bloody Theatre, or Martyrs Mirror of the Defenseless Christians: who baptized only upon confession of faith, and who suffered and died for the testimony of Jesus, their savior, from the time of Christ to the year A.D. 1660Braght, Thieleman J. van (Thieleman Janszoon)
History
The Bloody Theatre, or Martyrs Mirror of the Defenseless Christians: who baptized only upon confession of faith, and who suffered and died for the testimony of Jesus, their savior, from the time of Christ to the year A.D. 1660
Braght, Thieleman J. van (Thieleman Janszoon)
Anabaptists -- Europe -- Biography; Christian martyrs -- Biography; Persecution
Besides, that this power of binding and loosing was not given to Peter
alone, but to all the apostles, and also to the church, it is entirely
different in its nature from that of which the pope of Rome as the
imaginary successor of Peter boasts. For the power of which Christ
spoke, must be limited by the rule of his word, Matt. 7:24,26; Gal.
1:6–8; while on the contrary the power of which the pope boasts is
unlimited, has no rule, and extends as far as his pleasure. _Bald. in
cap. Eccles._ Also, _dist. 40. cap. S. Papae, etc._
It follows then, that to the pope is attributed wrongfully a power
which was not given to Peter himself; moreover, that the power which
was given him, was common to all the apostles, and also to the church.
REPLY TO THE THIRD PASSAGE.
The third passage (or argument) is taken from John 21:15–17, where the
Lord asked Peter three times, whether he loved him, and Peter answered
each time: “Yea, Lord, I love thee;” to which the Lord replied, three
times: “Feed my lambs;” “Watch my sheep,” etc.
Some among the Papists, in order to maintain the supremacy of Peter
and, consequently, that of the popes of Rome, have so strained these
words, that a certain celebrated author among them did not hesitate to
write, _that Peter is here appointed a ruler, watchman, and pastor, not
only over the church, but over the apostles themselves_. _Bell. lib. I.
de Pont. Rom. cap. 14. & 15. 16. Second. S. Velt. etc._
But herein they do violence to the text, since various arguments from
the holy Scriptures overthrow this view. For, in the first place, it
is certain, that at that time Peter had greatly and grievously gone
astray, more than any of the other apostles; since he, contrary to
warning and his own solemn promise, had so faithlessly denied, yea,
entirely forsaken, the Lord; hence, there is no probability that the
Lord exalted him above all the others, and appointed him ruler over
them; which would be altogether incompatible with the justice of
Christ, and the nature of the case.
In the second place it would not accord with what the Lord had taught
his apostles in general, on a previous occasion, when a strife had
arisen among them, as to which of them, after his departure, should
be the greatest; saying: “The kings of the Gentiles exercise lordship
over them; and they that exercise authority upon them are called
benefactors. But ye shall not be so: but he that is greatest among you,
let him be as the younger; and he that is chief, as he that doth serve.
Luke 22:25,26. Again: “Neither be ye called masters: for one is your
Master, even Christ.” Matt. 23:8,10.
In the third place, if we examine the proposed argument, we shall find,
that neither the threefold question of the Lord: _Lovest thou me?_ nor
his threefold injunction: “_Feed, or watch, my lambs, and sheep_,” was
directed to Peter any more than to the other apostles.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account