The Bloody Theatre, or Martyrs Mirror of the Defenseless Christians: who baptized only upon confession of faith, and who suffered and died for the testimony of Jesus, their savior, from the time of Christ to the year A.D. 1660Braght, Thieleman J. van (Thieleman Janszoon)
History
The Bloody Theatre, or Martyrs Mirror of the Defenseless Christians: who baptized only upon confession of faith, and who suffered and died for the testimony of Jesus, their savior, from the time of Christ to the year A.D. 1660
Braght, Thieleman J. van (Thieleman Janszoon)
Anabaptists -- Europe -- Biography; Christian martyrs -- Biography; Persecution
Thus John XXIV., having come to Bononia with many soldiers, threatened
all the cardinals severely, if they would elect a pope who would not
please him. When many had been nominated to him, and he would assent
to none of them, he was finally requested to state whom he would elect
thereto. He replied: “Give me Peter’s robe, and I shall deliver it to
the future pope.” But, when that was done, he put the robe upon his own
shoulders, saying: “I am the pope.” And though this greatly displeased
the other cardinals, they were nevertheless compelled to acquiesce in
it.
In the same manner John XXII. elected himself pope when the election
was committed to him. See 9th book of the above mentioned chronicle,
for the year 891, at the place there referred to.
NOTE.--In addition to what has been stated in the body [of this work]
concerning the popes who exalted themselves to the papal reign, it
is also proper to give what may be read in the “_Chronijk van den
Ondergang der Tyrannen_,” for the year 537, where the popedom of
Vigilius is thus spoken of: “This Pope Vigilius was certainly impelled
by the spirit of ambition; he greatly aspired to the popedom, and
wrongfully ascended the papal chair, for he counseled the empress, how
to expel Pope Silverius. He engaged false witnesses, who said that
Silverius intended to betray the city of Rome secretly, and surrender
it to the Goths (of which we shall afterwards speak more fully);
therefore he was deposed from the popedom by force, and relegated into
misery; and thus Vigilius six days afterwards became pope. The Empress
Theodora desired him to reinstate Anthenius at Constantinople, as he
had promised to do; but Vigilius refused, saying that one was not
bound to keep a bad promise against one’s conscience.” Compared with
the account of Platina, in his _“Panselijk Register,” fol. 110_. Also,
_Chron. Fasci. Temp. fol. 117_.
OF SOME WHO ATTAINED POSSESSION OF THE ROMAN CHAIR THROUGH SECULAR
POWER AND OTHER UNGODLY MEANS.
There is, moreover, mention made of another kind of popes, who attained
possession of the Roman chair, not properly through themselves,
inasmuch as they were too weak, but through the power of princes and
potentates, yea, even through the Arians. Among these are particularly
numbered the two popes named Felix, both of whom were exalted to papal
dignity, and put in their office by Arian Kings, who ruled Italy, and,
consequently, also the city of Rome; the one by Constantius,[56] the
other by Theodoric, both of whom belonged to the Arian sect. _Caes.
Bar. Ann. 526. num. 2._
[56] This Constantius was a Roman emperor, while Theodoric was King
of the Goths.
But quite the contrary happened when pope Silverius was reputed to
favor the Goths, who sided with the Arians. Prince Belizarius deposed
him, and sent him away into Greece, putting Vigilius in his stead as
pope. According to the testimony of Procopius. _Ann. 538. num. 2._
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account