The Bloody Theatre, or Martyrs Mirror of the Defenseless Christians: who baptized only upon confession of faith, and who suffered and died for the testimony of Jesus, their savior, from the time of Christ to the year A.D. 1660Braght, Thieleman J. van (Thieleman Janszoon)
History
The Bloody Theatre, or Martyrs Mirror of the Defenseless Christians: who baptized only upon confession of faith, and who suffered and died for the testimony of Jesus, their savior, from the time of Christ to the year A.D. 1660
Braght, Thieleman J. van (Thieleman Janszoon)
Anabaptists -- Europe -- Biography; Christian martyrs -- Biography; Persecution
FURTHER REMARKS CONCERNING BAPTISM IN THIS CENTURY.
From the writings of Walafridus Strabonus we may clearly infer what
manner of baptism was practiced at this time, in the first as well
as in the second century, and also long afterwards, namely, that no
infants, but adult, reasonable, and believing persons were baptized,
and this, according to the example of Christ and his holy apostles.
_Jac. Mehrn., Bapt. Hist., p. 524, D. I. Vicecomes, lib. I, cap. 4._
Walafridus Strabo (_in lib. de Rebus Eccles., cap. 26_) writes: “We
must know that originally believers were very simply baptized in
streams and springs; for our Lord Jesus Christ himself, in order to
sanctify such washing for us, was baptized of John in Jordan; even we
read elsewhere: ‘John was baptizing in Enon near to Salim, because
there was much water there.’”
_Page 525_, from _D. Vicecomes, lib. 1, cap. 30_; also, _cap. 26_,
Strabo speaks thus concerning baptism: “We must know that in those
first times baptism was administered only to those who, in body as well
as in soul, were washed clean and white, so that they could both know
and understand, what benefit there was to be obtained in baptism, what
was to be confessed and believed, and, finally, what was necessary to
be observed by the regenerated in Christ.
He then relates of Augustine, that he was instructed in the faith
before he was baptized (of which we shall speak in the proper place);
but that subsequently, for the sake of improvement, as it is called,
the church, that is, the Roman church, practiced infant baptism, with
a view of freeing infants by this means from the punishment of God for
original sin. Then the followers of the true faith (thus he wrongly
calls the Romanists), in order that the children might not be lost, if
they should die without the means of regeneration, that is, baptism,
resolved that they should be baptized for the remission of sins. Hence
originated, he writes, the custom of having godfathers and godmothers,
who stand for the child at (literally, lift the child from) baptism,
and answer for them all that they themselves, on account of the
weakness of their infancy, are not able to confess.” Thus for Strabo.
N. B.--Concerning these words, D. Vicecomes writes thus: “Since
Walafridus Strabo removes the custom of infant baptism from the
primitive church, he also recognizes no older origin of the godfather’s
than which dates from a period subsequent to the times of Augustine.”
_Bapt. Hist., pp. 525, 526._
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account