The Bloody Theatre, or Martyrs Mirror of the Defenseless Christians: who baptized only upon confession of faith, and who suffered and died for the testimony of Jesus, their savior, from the time of Christ to the year A.D. 1660Braght, Thieleman J. van (Thieleman Janszoon)
History
The Bloody Theatre, or Martyrs Mirror of the Defenseless Christians: who baptized only upon confession of faith, and who suffered and died for the testimony of Jesus, their savior, from the time of Christ to the year A.D. 1660
Braght, Thieleman J. van (Thieleman Janszoon)
Anabaptists -- Europe -- Biography; Christian martyrs -- Biography; Persecution
_About A. D. 318._--It appears that when Athanasius was yet a boy,
at Alexandria also, baptism was not administered otherwise than upon
confession of faith; at least, that it was not customary to baptize
infants, is evident from the following circumstances of a certain
occurrence related by Ruffinus and Zozomenus: “When the day of the
martyr Peter was celebrated at Alexandria, by the Bishop Alexander, and
he, after the solemn service was over, was awaiting his assistants, or
pupils to dine with him, he observed in the distance some children
playing on the sea shore, who, very probably, not for the first time
were imitating the bishop and those things which are generally done in
church. But when he observed the children more attentively, he noticed
that they were performing some mysterious things. Astonished at this,
he summoned his assistants to him, and showed them what he had seen
from a distance. Then he commanded them to seize the children and bring
them to him. When they came, he asked them, what they had been playing,
and what and how they had been doing? They, as was natural for their
years, at first were frightened, and denied the matter, but afterwards
related it just as it had taken place, and confessed that they, through
Athanasius, who in this game had imitated the Bishop, had baptized some
catechumens, that is, boys who had not been baptized. Alexander then
inquired of those who they said had been baptized, what questions had
been put to them, and what they had answered; likewise interrogating
him who had put the questions; and found that all was in accordance
with the manner of our religion. _Jac. Mehrn., 2d part, pp. 356, 357,
from Nicephor., lib. 8, cap. 44._ Also, _H. Montan. Nietigh., pp. 64,
65, from Ruffin. Eccl. Hist. 1, cap. 14. Zozom. Eccl. Hist., lib. 3,
cap. 16_.
From these circumstances it is evident that infant baptism was not
customary there. First, when we take into consideration the conduct of
these boys, we see that in the Christian church at Alexandria the usual
mode of baptizing at that time was this, namely: that the Bishop, or
whoever administered baptism, first interrogated the candidates for
baptism, and then, after they had answered him, they were baptized.
Secondly, if we consider the boys themselves, who apparently were ten
or twelve years old, which probability is increased by the fact that
Ruffinus (as H. Montanus shows), calls them catechumens, that is, such
as were being instructed in the faith, which is plainly indicated by
their performance, since they were able to imitate in every particular
such important services. These boys are nevertheless called unbaptized,
wherefore Athanasius, though by way of play, baptized them.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account