The Bloody Theatre, or Martyrs Mirror of the Defenseless Christians: who baptized only upon confession of faith, and who suffered and died for the testimony of Jesus, their savior, from the time of Christ to the year A.D. 1660Braght, Thieleman J. van (Thieleman Janszoon)
History
The Bloody Theatre, or Martyrs Mirror of the Defenseless Christians: who baptized only upon confession of faith, and who suffered and died for the testimony of Jesus, their savior, from the time of Christ to the year A.D. 1660
Braght, Thieleman J. van (Thieleman Janszoon)
Anabaptists -- Europe -- Biography; Christian martyrs -- Biography; Persecution
For, if they reckon from the beginning of the world, we have shown,
that Cain, who was a murderer, has had his successors as well as Abel,
who was slain for the sake of his faith[48] and godliness.
[48] “By faith Abel offered unto God a more excellent sacrifice
than Cain, by which he obtained witness that he was righteous, God
testifying of his gifts: and by it he being dead yet speaketh.” Heb.
11:4.
And also, if they reckon from the time of the apostles, we have
demonstrated that at that time already there were many apostates, yea,
adversaries of the Christian religion and the true worship of God; and
that more have followed, according to the prophecies and predictions
which the holy apostles uttered and left to posterity.
Hence it follows, that neither the antiquity, nor the long or great
succession of persons, can assure the truth of any religion or church,
since the evil is as ancient as the good, and the erring spirits and
evil doers have had, and still have, as great a succession as the true
believers and good; unless the antiquity, and the succession of persons
be accompanied with the divine truth and piety possessed by the upright
ancients in the beginning.
OBJECTION OF THE PAPISTS, BY MEANS OF THREE PASSAGES.
But, in order to maintain the aforementioned succession, the Papists
are accustomed to say, that they do not reckon the same from the
antiquity of some erring spirits who were before, in, or after the time
of the apostles; but from the church of Christ itself, and from Peter,
whom they styled the prince of the apostles, upon whom Christ himself,
as they asserted, wished to build his church. _Bell. lib. 1. de pont
Rom. cap. 10. Quansuys ex._
To this they add as a second argument, that to him, and no other, were
given, by Christ, the keys of heaven, to open or to close the same
according to his pleasure.
And, thirdly, that the Lord thrice commanded him--more than the other
apostles--to feed his flock, that is, his church.
Moreover, that he occupied the Roman throne, and that the popes
succeeded him therein.
To prove this supremacy of Peter, and, consequently, the succession of
the popes in his place, they have, for a long time already, misused
three passages of holy Scripture, namely Matt. 16:18,19; and John
21:15–17; to which we will reply in the following.
REPLY TO THE FIRST PASSAGE.
Matt. 16:18, the Lord says: “Upon this rock I will build my church.”
The error of the Romanists consists in this, that they misinterpret the
word _petra_, as though thereby was meant the apostle Peter; but this
is a great and palpable error. For the Lord there plainly distinguishes
between the name _Petros_ (Peter) and the word _petra_ (rock); saying
immediately before: “Thou art _Peter_,” but afterwards: “and upon this
_rock_;” upon which follows: “I will build my church;” so that the Lord
does not promise there, to build his church upon _Peter_, but upon the
_rock_; which he plainly mentions.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account