Young Ramsay became an accomplished man of the world, and had more than
a double share, like his father before him, of the pawkiness attributed,
though not always truthfully, to his countrymen. He was soon in London
and painting Lord Bute most diligently. He did it so well that he made
Reynolds, in emulation, carefully elaborate a full-length that he was
doing at the time. “I wish to show legs with Ramsay’s Lord Bute,” quoth
he. The King preferred Ramsay; he talked German, an accomplishment rare
with Englishmen at the period, and he fell in, so to say, with the
King’s homely ways. When His Majesty had dined plentifully on his
favourite boiled mutton and turnips he would say: “Now, Ramsay, sit down
in my place and take your dinner.” He was a curled darling of great folk
and was appointed Court painter in 1767. A universal favourite, even
Johnson had a good word for him. All this has nothing to do with art,
and nobody puts him beside Reynolds, but he was highly prosperous. The
King was wont to present the portrait of himself and his consort to all
sorts of great people, so Ramsay and his assistants were kept busy. Once
he went on a long visit to Rome, partly on account of his health. He
left directions with his most able assistant, Philip Reinagle, to get
ready fifty pairs of Kings and Queens at ten guineas apiece. Now
Reinagle had learned to paint so like Ramsay that no mortal man could
tell the difference, but as he painted over and over again the
commonplace features of their Majesties, he got heartily sick of the
business. He struck for more pay and got thirty instead of ten guineas,
so after the end of six years he managed to get through with it, somehow
or other, but ever afterwards he looked back upon the period as a horrid
nightmare. Ramsay was a scholar, a wit, and a gentleman. In a coarse age
he was delicate and choice. He was fond of tea, but wine was too much
for his queasy stomach. Art was certainly not the all in all for him,
and his pictures are feeble. Possibly he did not much care; he had his
reward. Some critics have thought that he might have been a great
painter if his heart had been entirely in his work.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account