The early life of many Scots artists (and doctors) is connected with
Edinburgh, but the most important part is given to London. Thus Sir
David Wilkie belongs first of all to Fife, for he was born at Cults,
where his father was parish minister. His mother saw him drawing
something with chalk on the floor. The child said he was making “bonnie
Lady Gonie,” referring to Lady Balgonie, who lived near. Obviously this
same story might have been told of many people, not afterwards eminent.
In fact, Wilkie’s development was not rapid. In 1799, when he was
fourteen, he went to the Trustees Academy at Edinburgh. George Thomson,
the Secretary, after examining his drawings declared that they had not
sufficient merit to procure his admission. The Earl of Leven, however,
insisted he must be admitted, and admitted he was. He proceeded to draw
from the antique, not at first triumphantly. His father showed one of
his studies to one of his elders. “What was it?” queried the douce man.
“A foot,” was the answer. “A fute! a fute! it’s mair like a fluke than a
fute.” In 1804 he returned to Cults where he employed himself painting
Pitlessie Fair. At church he saw an ideal character study nodding in one
of the pews. He soon had it transferred to the flyleaf of the Bible. He
had not escaped attention, and was promptly taken to task. He stoutly
asserted that in the sketch the eye and the hand alone were engaged, he
could hear the sermon all the time. The ingenuity or matchless impudence
of this assertion fairly astounded his accusers, and the matter dropped.
I do not tell here how he went to London and became famous. How famous
let this anecdote show. In 1817 he was at Abbotsford making a group of
the Scott family: he went with William Laidlaw to Altrive to see Hogg.
“Laidlaw,” said the shepherd, “this is not the great Mr. Wilkie?” “It’s
just the great Mr. Wilkie, Hogg.” The poet turned to the painter: “I
cannot tell you how pleased I am to see you in my house and how glad I
am to see you are so young a man.”
[Illustration: REV. JOHN THOMSON OF DUDDINGSTON,
From the Engraving by Croll]
This curious greeting is explained thus: Hogg had taken Wilkie for a
horse-couper. What Wilkie would have taken Hogg for we are not told,
possibly for something of the same.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account