It were easy and useless to dwell on the glaring contrasts in character
between Mary and her son James, between the most tragically unfortunate
and the most prosaically fortunate of the Stuarts. Such contrasts
between the character and fate of parent and child are not uncommon in
daily life. The first day of James on earth was memorable for the
dramatic meeting of his father and mother. He was born in Edinburgh
Castle, in the little room that is shown you there, between nine and ten
on the morning of Wednesday, 19th June 1566. About two in the afternoon
Darnley came to see his child. Like everybody else in Edinburgh, he had
known of the event for hours, since a few minutes after the birth heavy
guns, almost at Mary’s bedside and without a word of protest from the
courageous woman, had roared out their signal to the capital that
well-nigh went mad on the instant with joy and pride. The nurse put the
child into Darnley’s arms. “My Lord,” said Mary simply and solemnly,
“God has given you and me a son.” Then she turned to Sir William
Stanley: “This is the son who I hope shall first unite the two kingdoms
of Scotland and England.” The Englishman said something courteous about
the prior rights of Mary and Darnley, and then Mary wandered off into
the Rizzio business only three months before. What would have happened
if they had then killed her? You fancy the colour went and came in
Darnley’s face. “These things are all past,” he muttered. “Then,” said
the Queen, “let them go.” As James grew up he became well-nigh the most
eminent of royal and noble authors, and that strange mixture of
erudition, folly, wisdom, and simplicity which marks him as one of the
oddest characters in history. He was great in nicknames and phrases, and
the nicknames stuck and the phrases are remembered. “Tam o’ the Coogate”
for the powerful Earl of Haddington; “Jock o’ the Sclates” for the Earl
of Mar, because he, when James’s fellow-pupil, had been entrusted by
George Buchanan with a slate thereon to note James’s little peccadilloes
in his tutor’s absence; better than all, “Jingling Geordie” for George
Heriot the goldsmith. What a word picture that gives you of the
prosperous merchant prince who possibly hinted more than once that he
could an he would buy up the whole Court! That well-known story of
ostentatious benevolence can hardly be false. George visited James at
Holyrood and found him over a fire of cedar wood, and the King had much
to say of the costly fuel; and then the other invited him to visit his
booth hard by St. Giles’, where he was shown a still more costly fire of
the Royal bonds or promissory notes, as we might call them in the
language of to-day. We know that the relations between the banker and
his Royal customer were of the very best; and how can we say anything
but good of Heriot when we think of that splendid and beautiful
foundation that to-day holds its own with anything that modern Edinburgh
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account