The Book of the West: The story of western Canada, its birth and early adventures, its youthful combats, its peaceful settlement, its great transformation, and its present waysKennedy, Howard Angus
History
The Book of the West: The story of western Canada, its birth and early adventures, its youthful combats, its peaceful settlement, its great transformation, and its present ways
Kennedy, Howard Angus
Northwest, Canadian
Yet the reasons which decided Canada to carry out this tremendous
railway scheme were wholly peaceful—to open up a land of homes for
loyal people on the plains, and to join the East and Centre with the
farthest West; to unite our scattered little communities in one great
Dominion.
There was only one thing uniting these three regions—a sentiment. They
all knew and felt that they were members of one great brotherhood, the
royal republic known as the British Empire. The British Columbians could
have “paddled their own canoe” and remained separate from the Canadians
if they had wanted; but they did not want. Their legislature unanimously
and wisely voted in favor of federating with the newly formed Dominion
of Canada in 1871—on condition that within ten years a railway should
be built connecting that far western province with the railway system of
Eastern Canada.
The colony on the Pacific, with a small population, hemmed in both north
and south, would have found it hard to maintain an independent existence
if she had not joined forces with her fellow-countrymen in the East.
British Columbia, too, was the only possible gateway of Canada to the
West. Without a transcontinental railway, the rest of our country would
have been cut off from its natural and necessary outlet to the trade of
the Pacific, a trade already large and destined to become enormous.
Just as urgent was the need of this railway to open up the land between
the Rockies and the Lakes for the millions of British folk and others
who desired new homes under the British flag, which stood then, as it
stands to-day, for the union of steadfast liberty with steadfast law.
The United States, face to face with the same problem, had just solved
it by completing in 1869 a transcontinental railway system which linked
California with New York and at the same time opened up the western
plains of that country to the home-maker. That was not only an example
but a warning.
The United States, of course, had plenty of land, enormous territories
of its own to fill up; but the evil habit of coveting a neighbor’s
possessions is found among those who have plenty as well as among those
who have little. South of the line were many who looked with covetous
eyes on the fertile land in the north. Their plan to “jump the claim” to
this land might have become a serious danger if no one had been living
here except fur traders and Indians.
What staved off the danger, to begin with, was the settlement of the Red
River district, by the energy and self-sacrifice of Lord Selkirk. The
settlers were only a handful; but they “held the fort” and set an
example, and after a while others began to dribble in, as you have heard
already. The situation would again have become serious, however, when
the Union Pacific Railway brought settlers and adventurers crowding into
the Western States, if an easy way had not been provided for our own
people to settle our own western territory from Eastern Canada and from
overseas.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account