I have elsewhere in this volume attempted to show that, even in our
own days, there is nothing particularly incredible about a witch--and
that the disrespect into which she has fallen is due rather to our
modern lack of any sense of proportion in our beliefs, than to any
fault of her own. Certainly we have no cause to pride ourselves on
any intellectual superiority to the great divines and scholars of
past ages who devoted themselves to the dissection or condemnation
of witchcraft--rather we should deplore our lack of faith and of
imagination. For them there existed no possibility of doubt, no
relative standard of fact or theory. The premises were absolute.
The spiritual world was based upon the word of God as expressed in
the Bible and translated by the Church. To argue the absurdity or
inadmissibility of any particular tenet of Christian doctrine was to
suppose a paradox--the fallibility of the infallible. Eminent jurists,
as was Bodin, or learned physicians such as Wierus, both writing
towards the close of the sixteenth century, arguing with great mental
dexterity on opposite sides, alike accepted the initial axiom, cramp
and confine them though it might. They had, indeed, no alternative--as
well might two modern astronomers in disputing over the whereabouts
of an undiscovered planet deny the existence of the sun. The humane
Wierus, a friend of Sir Philip Sidney, by the way, preaches from the
same text as does the judicial Bodin--though he delivers a different
sermon. Bodin, supporter of the old conventions, makes a formidable
onslaught on Wierus--not for any scepticism as to the existence of
witches--no ground was given him for such an accusation--but for
maintaining against the view of the Church that witches were victims
rather than disciples of the Devil. Nor, in the face of the very
explicit injunction, "Thou shalt not suffer a witch to live"--and the
suggestion was still to be mooted that "witch" in the original stood
for "poisoner"--can we accuse those who obeyed it of having acted from
any other motives than those of earnest Christians. It is true that
they carried zeal to the point of enthusiasm--but zeal has always been
accounted a mark of grace.
As we have seen the severest period of witch-persecution commences from
their definite classification as heretics by the Bull of Innocent VIII.
issued in 1484. The Bull itself was not lacking in directness:--"It
has come to our ears," it commences, "that great numbers of both sexes
are not afraid to abuse their own bodies with devils that serve to both
sexes. And with their Inchantments, charms and sorceries to vex and
afflict Man and Beast with inward and outward pains and tortures....
Therefore with the authority apostolic we have given power to the
Inquisitor ... to convict, imprison and punish."
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account