However much we may sympathise with the victims of such judicial
proceedings, it would be less than fair to blame the general public for
its attitude towards them when such men as Blackstone or Sir Matthew
Hale were convinced of their reasonableness. Blackstone, indeed, one
of the greatest of English lawyers, went so far as to declare that "to
deny the possibility, nay, the actual existence of witchcraft is at
once flatly to contradict the revealed Word of God." The attitude of
Sir Matthew Hale, Lord Chief Justice, an enlightened and God-fearing
man, may best be gathered from an account of one of the trials in which
he was concerned. In 1664, at St. Edmundsbury, two women, Amy Duny
and Rose Cullender, were tried before him upon the usual charges. The
first witness was Dorothy Durent, whose child was under the care of
Rose Cullender. Dorothy had for some time suspected Rose of bewitching
her child--a fact which throws some doubt upon the witness's maternal
care in confiding her offspring to such a nurse. Eventually the witness
consulted a witch-doctor, a proceeding which, had she known it,
rendered her liable to conviction as well as Rose, under the statute
of James I.[1] The doctor advised her to hang up her child's blanket
in the chimney, which she did. On taking it down some time later, she
was horror-stricken to find a toad in it. This toad she had "put it
into the fire and held it there, though it made a great and horrible
noise, and flashed like gunpowder and went off like a pistol, and then
became invisible, and that by this the prisoner was scorched and burnt
lamentably." Other witnesses, Mr. Pacy and Edmund Durent, deposed
that Rose Cullender and Amy Duny came to them to buy herrings, and,
on being refused, went away grumbling. Further, it appeared that Amy
Duny had told Cornelius Sandwell's wife that if she did not fetch her
geese home, they would be destroyed. She also told Cornelius that if
he did not attend to a rickety chimney in his house it would fall.
John Soan deposed that he had three carts wherein to carry corn. One
of them "wrenched Amy Duny's house, whereat she scolded him. That very
day his cart overturned two or three times, and his children had fits."
Probably such damning evidence would have sufficed by itself. It was
driven home by that of Sir Thomas Browne, who declared with dangerous
moderation that "the fits were natural, but heightened by the Devil
co-operating with the malice of the Witches, at whose Instance he did
the villainies." This was too much for the Lord Chief Justice. He "was
in such fears and proceeded with such caution that he would not so much
as sum up the evidence, but left it to the Jury, with prayers that the
great God of Heaven would direct their hearts in this weighty manner."
Needless to say, the jury returned a sentence of "Guilty." Amy Duny
and Rose Cullender were hanged at Cambridge accordingly, obstinately
refusing to confess, and no sooner were they dead than the afflicted
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account