The books of Chronicles : $b With maps, notes and introductionElmslie, W. A. L. (William Alexander Leslie)
History
The books of Chronicles : $b With maps, notes and introduction
Elmslie, W. A. L. (William Alexander Leslie)
Bible. Chronicles -- Commentaries
_Zerah the Ethiopian_] Rather, =Zerah the Cushite= (“man of Cush”).
Cush (Genesis x. 7) was the ancestor of certain Arabian tribes,
including Saba, see 1 Chronicles i. 9; and Arabians and Cushites
(“Ethiopians” Authorized Version, also Revised Version) are mentioned
as neighbours (2 Chronicles xxi. 16). It is therefore highly probable
that the leader of the inroad was an Arabian (Sabean) and not an
Ethiopian. (Compare S. A. Cook in _Expository Times_ June, 1906, p.
541, against Petrie, _History of Egypt._) _Zerah_ perhaps represents
_Dhirrīh_ (_Zirrīh_), a title (meaning “the magnificent”) of several
of the oldest princes of Saba. The tradition may therefore be brought
into connection with the many indications in Chronicles of Arabian
incursions on the southern borders of Judah. Mareshah, where the battle
was fought (verse 9), was one of the ancient seats of the Calebites
from which they were driven northwards (compare 1 Chronicles ii.).
Those who prefer to regard Cushite as = Ethiopian――see 1 Chronicles
i. 8――and Zerah as an Egyptian king, have to suppose that “Ethiopian”
is applied to him loosely and somewhat ignorantly; and further, as
no king of Egypt is so named, that Zerah must denote Osorkon I or II,
or perhaps be the name of a general of Osorkon. From xvi. 8 (see the
note on _Lubim_) it would seem probable that the _Chronicler_ believed
Zerah’s host to be an Egyptian force.
_a thousand thousand_] An inroad of the “children of the East” was
formidable from sheer weight of numbers. We may gather from xvi. 8 that
the original assailants were joined by other hordes as they drew near
the border of Judah. The number _a thousand thousand_ is probably meant
to signify that the host was too great to number; it is, of course, not
to be taken literally.
_three hundred chariots_] The chariots, though comparatively few, are
mentioned, (1) perhaps because Asa himself had _none_, (2) perhaps also
because they represent an Egyptian contingent. This suggestion receives
support from xvi. 8, where the Lubim (compare xii. 3) are associated
with the Cushites in the invasion. The cowardly foreign policy of
Egypt may have led her on this occasion to defend her own borders from
the barbarian hordes by encouraging them to invade her neighbour’s
territories.
The reading _three hundred_ is supported by the LXX. and is probably
right. The reading of the Peshitṭa, “thirty thousand,” and the wording
of xvi. 8, “with exceeding many chariots and horsemen,” seem like a
retouching of the narrative to make the number of the chariots and
horsemen correspond with the number of the whole host.
_Mareshah_] See note on xi. 8.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account