The books of Chronicles : $b With maps, notes and introductionElmslie, W. A. L. (William Alexander Leslie)
History
The books of Chronicles : $b With maps, notes and introduction
Elmslie, W. A. L. (William Alexander Leslie)
Bible. Chronicles -- Commentaries
_Soco ... Zanoah_] The Soco (Joshua xv. 48) and Zanoah (Joshua xv. 56)
here mentioned were situated to the south-west of Hebron. They are to
be distinguished from a Soco near the valley of Elah (Joshua xv. 35,
2 Chronicles xi. 7, xxviii. 18) and Zanoah near Beth-shemesh (Joshua
xv. 34).
_these are the sons of Bithiah_] See note on verse 17. A “daughter of
Pharaoh” is somewhat strange in such surroundings. For an interesting
emendation and interpretation, see Macalister, _Palestine Exploration
Fund, Quarterly Statement_, 1905, p. 252.
¹⁹And the sons of the wife of Hodiah, the sister of Naham, were
the father of Keilah the Garmite, and Eshtemoa the Maacathite.
²⁰And the sons of Shimon; Amnon, and Rinnah, Ben-hanan, and
Tilon. And the sons of Ishi; Zoheth, and Ben-zoheth.
=19.= _Keilah_] a town of the Shephelah (Joshua xv. 44), the scene of
one of David’s exploits (1 Samuel xxiii. 1‒5).
_Eshtemoa the Maacathite_] The epithet distinguishes this Eshtemoa from
that of verse 17. _The Maacathite_ may mean the descendant of Maacah
(ii. 48), the concubine of Caleb the brother of Jerahmeel.
=21‒23.= These verses purport to give some fragmentary information
of the descendants of _Shelah_. It must be owned that they are most
obscure, and much more difficult than they appear at first. In the
_Palestine Exploration Fund Statement_, 1905, pp. 243 ff., 328 ff.,
R. A. S. Macalister gives a highly ingenious reinterpretation of
this passage in the light of certain jar handles inscribed with names
similar to those mentioned here and in certain other passages of the
Chronicler’s genealogies; and conjectures that throughout the chapter
we have a (mutilated) genealogy of a family of craftsmen, tracing
descent from two individuals, a Jerahmeel and a Caleb. In a text so
obscure it is no objection that the theory involves several textual
emendations, and is too intricate for further treatment here. It is
rejected by Driver, _Modern Research_, p. 77.
²¹The sons of Shelah the son of Judah; Er the father of Lecah,
and Laadah the father of Mareshah, and the families of the house
of them that wrought fine linen, of the house of Ashbea;
=21.= _Shelah_] mentioned in ii. 3 as a son of Judah. As there is
no reference to him in iv. 1, perhaps these difficult verses are an
addition. For other references to his descendants, see ix. 5, Nehemiah
xi. 5.
_Mareshah_] ii. 42; 2 Chronicles xi. 8; Joshua xv. 44 (mentioned with
Keilah). A town in the south of Judah.
_the house of Ashbea_] Nothing is known of such a family. Render
perhaps _Beth-Ashbea_, but the place is otherwise unknown.
²²and Jokim, and the men of Cozeba, and Joash, and Saraph, who
had dominion in Moab, and Jashubi-lehem. And the records¹ are
ancient.
¹ Hebrew _words_.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account