The books of Chronicles : $b With maps, notes and introductionElmslie, W. A. L. (William Alexander Leslie)
History
The books of Chronicles : $b With maps, notes and introduction
Elmslie, W. A. L. (William Alexander Leslie)
Bible. Chronicles -- Commentaries
=1‒15.= In the finished system of the Jewish hierarchy, the Levitical
order is found to be in three main divisions, “families,” who in
the prevailing fashion, believed themselves to be descended from the
sons of Levi; Gershon, Kohath, and Merari. In verses 1‒3 this view is
expressed, and the connection is traced from Levi to Aaron, the first
of the traditional line of high-priests, which in verses 4‒15 is given
through Zadok down to the time of the Captivity. (1) The intention of
the list in verses 4‒15 is clear. It is given to declare the legitimacy
of Jehozadak the high-priest who went into exile at the fall of
Jerusalem and was accounted the father of Jeshua the high-priest of the
Return (see Ezra iii. 2, etc.; Nehemiah xii. 26; Haggai i. 1; Zechariah
vi. 11). Thus upon Jehozadak’s legitimacy depended the legitimacy of
the post-exilic priesthood of Jerusalem. (2) The mechanical nature
of the list is very evident when it is considered chronologically.
Allowing the standard 40 years for each of the twenty-three priests
in the list we get 40 × 12 + 40 × 11 = 920 years. This is in agreement
with the unhistorical but beautifully regular chronology of the
Priestly conception of the history, which allowed 480 years from
the Exodus (Aaron) to Solomon’s Temple, and again 480 years to the
foundation of the second Temple (Jeshua)――the Captivity (Jehozadak)
being reckoned as taking place in the _eleventh_ generation of the
second period. (3) The list presents some noteworthy features. The line
of high-priests from Eli to Abiathar is ignored, but this is natural,
since the ascendancy of the Zadokite line was ascribed to the Divine
anger against the house of Eli (1 Samuel iii. 12‒14; 1 Kings ii. 27).
It is curious, however, that this list of the high-priests omits
Jehoiada (mentioned in 2 Kings xi. 9; 2 Chronicles xxii. 11) and
Urijah (2 Kings xvi. 11 ff.) and an Azariah in the reign of Uzziah (2
Chronicles xxvi. 20) who should come between Amariah of Jehoshaphat’s
reign and Hilkiah in the time of Josiah. (4) Finally note that the
list of high-priests as far as the reign of David is repeated in verses
50‒53. It is a very difficult problem to determine the relation between
the two lists (see the head-note to verse 50).
¹The sons of Levi; Gershon¹, Kohath, and Merari.
¹ In verse 16, _Gershom_.
=1.= _The sons of Levi_] So Genesis xlvi. 11; Exodus vi. 16; Numbers
iii. 17, xxvi. 57――all from P.
²And the sons of Kohath; Amram, Izhar, and Hebron, and Uzziel.
=2.= _the sons of Kohath_] So Exodus vi. 18; Numbers iii. 19.
³And the children of Amram; Aaron, and Moses, and Miriam. And
the sons of Aaron; Nadab and Abihu, Eleazar and Ithamar.
=3.= _Aaron, and Moses_] The same order in Exodus vi. 20. Aaron was the
elder (Exodus vii. 7).
_And the sons of Aaron_] So Exodus vi. 23. Nadab and Abihu perished
childless; Leviticus x. 1 ff.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account