The books of the Apocrypha : $b their origin, teaching and contentsOesterley, W. O. E. (William Oscar Emil)
Religion
The books of the Apocrypha : $b their origin, teaching and contents
Oesterley, W. O. E. (William Oscar Emil)
Bible. Apocrypha -- Introductions
Although not strictly belonging to the present inquiry, it may not be
out of place to say a few words as to why contact with a holy object
such as a roll of the Scriptures should be conceived of as bringing
about a state of Levitical impurity. Some of the explanations which
have been offered might be convincing if this particular form of the
way in which Levitical impurity was brought about stood alone. But
the fact is that other things involved a similar state of impurity,
and one cannot restrict oneself to the explanation of one of these
while leaving the rest out of consideration, because, as will be seen
in studying the subject, identical conceptions lie ultimately at the
base of all. How, for example, is one to account for the fact that
both the touching of a holy thing like a scroll of the Law, as well
as the touching of an unclean thing like a leper or a dead body (to
mention no others),[228] was held to bring about a similar state of
Levitical impurity and to require an ablution? That reverence for the
dead could have had nothing to do with this is proved by the fact
that a state of impurity was brought about not only by contact with a
dead person, but equally so by contact with a dead animal.
When one studies the laws of uncleanness in the Book of Leviticus
and compares them with many customs prevalent among uncultured
races,[229] one soon realizes the truth of Robertson Smith’s words
that “the irrationality of laws of uncleanness, from the standpoint
of spiritual religion, or even of the higher heathenism, is so
manifest, that they must necessarily be looked on as having survived
from an earlier form of faith and of society. And this being so,
I do not see how any historical student can refuse to class them
with savage taboos.”[230] Such survivals are to be seen in the
laws of uncleanness in the Book of Leviticus, not that there was
any idea of this when the writer of that book embodied in it those
popular traditional rules and customs which had been in vogue for
millenniums, any more than there was when the Pharisees decided that
certain books should henceforth be regarded as so holy that the mere
touch of them brought about Levitical impurity; they merely adopted
the outward expression of an antique conception, the essential
significance of which had been forgotten for untold ages.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account