The books of the Apocrypha : $b their origin, teaching and contentsOesterley, W. O. E. (William Oscar Emil)
Religion
The books of the Apocrypha : $b their origin, teaching and contents
Oesterley, W. O. E. (William Oscar Emil)
Bible. Apocrypha -- Introductions
memorable days of the Ptolemys, was not yet wholly extinguished and
still possessed sufficient power to protect itself against the yoke
which Pharisaism sought to put upon the people?”[287]
It is not necessary to assume that all the literature produced by
the Jews during these centuries emanated either from Pharisaic or
Sadducæan circles. There are other alternatives; and in the present
case it seems most probable that the bulk of this book was written
by apocalyptists who belonged neither to Pharisaic nor yet to
Sadducæan circles.
The Book of Enoch was originally written partly in Aramaic
(vi.-xxxvi., lxxxiii.-xc., according to Charles) and partly in Hebrew
(the rest of the book). No portion of the book in its original form
has come down to us; the Ethiopic version is the only complete one
extant, it was translated from the Greek version of which only
fragments remain.[288] The Latin version, which was also made from
the Greek, is not extant with the exception of i. 9, cvi. 1-18. That
the book is Palestinian is generally acknowledged; its original
language of itself points to this.
The Book of Enoch is in many respects the most important of all
the apocalypses, since it is without a rival for the history of
doctrinal development during the last two pre-Christian centuries.
The teaching of the book is sometimes contradictory, which is not
to be wondered at in view of its composite authorship; for example,
in lxix. 11 it is said that man was originally created without sin,
“like the angels,” but that death came through sin and destroyed
him; but elsewhere the entering in of sin from the first is traced
to the spiritual world. The doctrines of angels and demons appear in
a developed form in this book. The teaching concerning the Kingdom
is likewise contradictory; vi.-xxxvi. are full of materialistic
ideas, whereas xci.-civ. are marked by conceptions which are entirely
spiritual. So, too, with regard to the Messiah; at one time He is
represented as without having any special _rôle_ to fill, at another
He appears as the “Righteous One,” or as the “Elect One,” “The Son
of Man,” and “The Christ” or “Anointed One.” Regarding the Last
Things, the teaching about the Judgement varies according as to
whether the Messianic Kingdom is conceived of as an eternal earthly
kingdom, in which case the final Judgement precedes it, or as only
a temporary earthly kingdom, when the Judgement takes place at
its close; in xxxvii.-lxxi. (“The Similitudes”) it is taught that
the Messianic Kingdom is eternal and embraces heaven and earth,
here it is initiated by the final Judgement. The punishment of the
wicked takes place in Sheol, part of which is a place of fire, and
equivalent to the later Gehenna conception; another part of Sheol
is described as an intermediate resting-place of the righteous.
In the oldest portions of the book both soul and body, a physical
body, rise and abide eternally in the earthly Messianic Kingdom; in
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account