The books of the Apocrypha : $b their origin, teaching and contentsOesterley, W. O. E. (William Oscar Emil)
Religion
The books of the Apocrypha : $b their origin, teaching and contents
Oesterley, W. O. E. (William Oscar Emil)
Bible. Apocrypha -- Introductions
The text here is uncertain; the Hebrew is not extant and the
Versions differ, so that one cannot be sure about its meaning. Dr.
Tennant paraphrases the Greek thus: “Even the sun darkens itself—the
brightest thing in the world; how much more, then, frail man!” And,
in commenting on the words, he says that if Ben-Sira offers any
excuse for man’s depravity “it is that of his natural and essential
frailty ... but [that he] never [attributes it] to an external
cause.” Difficult as the verse is, it is quite possible that what
was in Ben-Sira’s mind was that the origin of Sin was to be found in
man, for it is extremely doubtful whether he differentiated between
Sin as an abstract conception and actual deeds of Sin committed by
individuals. The idea that seems to be adumbrated here as to the
origin of Sin is, in any case, true from one point of view, for it
accords with the facts of experience if human free-will is believed
in, and Ben-Sira does believe in this (see next section); for every
sin committed originates, so far as any particular sin is concerned,
in man, whatever be the origin of the sinful tendency. This can be
illustrated by one other quotation:
But the sinner is ensnared through his lips,
And the fool stumbleth through his mouth (xxiii. 8).
Ben-Sira’s teaching concerning the origin of Sin may, then, be
summed up thus: He implies, though he hardly goes so far as to
make the definite assertion, that the origin of Sin is due to God;
yet in one important passage he strongly combats this. He teaches,
further, that so far as the human race is concerned the origin of
Sin is to be sought in the fall of Eve, but he does not attempt to
trace its history further back; this was, however, from his point
of view unnecessary if, in accordance with his third theory, sin
originates in the individual; nevertheless, he involves himself in a
contradiction here in saying that because of Eve’s sin all men must
die. In addition to this, however, there is a further inconsistency
regarding this third theory, for while teaching that Sin originates
_in_ man, he sometimes speaks of it as something external to him.
These contradictory thoughts bring into clear relief Ben-Sira’s
inability to formulate a consistent and logical doctrine as to the
origin of Sin; and in this he but shows himself the forerunner of the
Rabbis, from whose writings it can be seen that these later thinkers
were involved in precisely the same inconsistencies as soon as they
attempted to construct a working theory on the subject.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account