The books of the Apocrypha : $b their origin, teaching and contentsOesterley, W. O. E. (William Oscar Emil)
Religion
The books of the Apocrypha : $b their origin, teaching and contents
Oesterley, W. O. E. (William Oscar Emil)
Bible. Apocrypha -- Introductions
and in xxx. 17 death is spoken of as an “eternal rest” (cp. xxxviii.
23, xlvi. 19). This idea of rest for the soul hereafter is “very
different from that of death being corruption and the end of all
things, which is the more usual one in Ecclesiasticus, and one is
perhaps justified in seeing the beginnings of development here,
based, it is true, on some Old Testament passages; the conception
of the dead resting must involve some sort of a belief beyond the
bare existence of the shade hereafter.”[337] It is of particular
interest to note that in one or two cases the Greek shows signs of
some development of conception regarding the future life where in the
Hebrew the normal Old Testament position is maintained; thus in vii.
17 the Hebrew has:
Humble thy pride greatly,
For the expectation of man is worms.
This is rendered in the Greek:
Humble thy soul greatly,
For the punishment of the ungodly man is fire and the worm.
It is clear that the development which is known to have taken place
in the doctrine of the future life during the second century B.C. is
reflected here. Very noticeable is the fact that a kind of technical
sense has become attached to the word “worm,” such as we find in
Mark ix. 48 (“... where their worm dieth not, and the fire is not
quenched”). In xxi. 9, 10 it is probable that a similar development
exists, though in this case it cannot be proved as the Hebrew is
unfortunately not extant; but in view of the example just given it
is highly probable that the following reading of the Greek likewise
represents a developed idea:
Like tow wrapped together is the assembly of the ungodly,
And their end is the flame of fire.
The way of sinners is made smooth without stones,
And at the end thereof is the pit of Hades.
It will be noticed that the parallelism between “the flame of fire,”
and “the pit of Hades,” suggests that the latter has developed into
Gehenna. Another example is to be found in xlviii. 11, where the
reference is to Elijah; only one line of the original couplet is
decipherable in the Hebrew, viz.:
Blessed is he that seeth thee and dieth;
i.e. the man who before he died saw Elijah is blessed; the next line
is illegible in the Hebrew and corrupt in the Greek; but the point of
importance is that the Greek adds this further line:
And we also shall surely live,
the reference being evidently to the life hereafter, since Elijah is
the subject of the preceding couplet.
One other passage must be mentioned, not because in itself it points
to any development of thought, but because the Old Testament episode
(1 Kings xvii. 17-24) to which it refers must sooner or later have
suggested the thought of the dead rising; it is also in reference to
Elijah (xlviii. 5):
Who didst raise up a dead man from death,
And from Sheol, according to the good pleasure of Jehovah.
The Hebrew and the Greek do not differ materially.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account