The books of the Apocrypha : $b their origin, teaching and contentsOesterley, W. O. E. (William Oscar Emil)
Religion
The books of the Apocrypha : $b their origin, teaching and contents
Oesterley, W. O. E. (William Oscar Emil)
Bible. Apocrypha -- Introductions
to the Law of their forefathers into legal burdens, the latter clung
loyally to the simple belief of those self-same forefathers, a belief
which was not blurred by intricate learning and a superabundant ‘oral
tradition’; theirs was a piety, on the contrary, which was born of
the spirit of the times and, therefore, such as was characteristic of
the common folk.”[130]
It will, no doubt, strike some as incongruous that the Pharisees,
with their circumscribed anti-Hellenistic views, and the
Apocalyptists, with their enlarged purview and pre-Hellenistic
ideas, should be said to have possessed a common ancestry; but
there are two facts which are of themselves sufficient to show the
probability of this having been the case: belief in a future life
among the Jews was largely due to Greek thought; it was one of the
main themes of apocalyptic teaching; but it was also one of the most
prominent tenets of the Pharisees, who developed it from the Platonic
doctrine of the immortality of the soul to a definite belief in the
resurrection of the body. That two schools of thought, differing in
some vital respects, should nevertheless be in agreement in differing
from the normal teaching of the Old Testament on such a special and
peculiarly important subject as that of the future life, certainly
points to an originally identical parentage. We have laid stress
on the fact that in pre-Maccabæan times the Jewish nation, as a
whole, was more or less influenced by the Hellenistic spirit; one
section of the people would be influenced in this way, another in
that. Thus, as an example, the _Chassidim_ were influenced by the
Hellenistic teaching on the future life; but the ruling classes were
not, they clung to the old traditional teaching as contained in the
Old Testament. Or again, among the _Chassidim_ were many who were
influenced by the freer and more tolerant atmosphere of the Greek
spirit, agreeing in this with the ruling classes, but differing from
those with whom they were in some other respects in agreement. So
that when, later, clearly defined parties came into existence, they
would not necessarily differ on _all_ points; and Pharisees and
Apocalyptists agreed as a whole upon the subject of a belief in the
future life, though, as we shall see, various opinions on certain
points concerning the future life were held by the Apocalyptists.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account